[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1553599.1715262072@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 09 May 2024 14:41:12 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Max Kellermann <max.kellermann@...os.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
cc: dhowells@...hat.com, Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] ext4: Don't reduce symlink i_mode by umask if no ACL support
If CONFIG_EXT4_FS_POSIX_ACL=n then the fallback version of ext4_init_acl()
will mask off the umask bits from the new inode's i_mode. This should not
be done if the inode is a symlink. If CONFIG_EXT4_FS_POSIX_ACL=y, then we
go through posix_acl_create() instead which does the right thing with
symlinks.
Fix this by making the fallback version of ext4_init_acl() do nothing if
inode is a symlink.
Fixes: 484fd6c1de13 ("ext4: apply umask if ACL support is disabled")
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
---
fs/ext4/acl.h | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/acl.h b/fs/ext4/acl.h
index ef4c19e5f570..566625286442 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/acl.h
+++ b/fs/ext4/acl.h
@@ -71,7 +71,8 @@ ext4_init_acl(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode, struct inode *dir)
/* usually, the umask is applied by posix_acl_create(), but if
ext4 ACL support is disabled at compile time, we need to do
it here, because posix_acl_create() will never be called */
- inode->i_mode &= ~current_umask();
+ if (!S_ISLNK(inode->i_mode))
+ inode->i_mode &= ~current_umask();
return 0;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists