[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240509134924.GA13607@lst.de>
Date: Thu, 9 May 2024 15:49:24 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Steven Price <steven.price@....com>
Cc: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>,
nex.sw.ncis.osdt.itp.upstreaming@...el.com, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/7] dma: avoid redundant calls for sync operations
On Thu, May 09, 2024 at 02:43:52PM +0100, Steven Price wrote:
> The specific drivers are "rockchip-drm" and "rk_gmac-dwmac". Is it a
> requirement that all drivers engaging in DMA should call dma_set_mask()
> - and therefore this has uncovered a bug in those drivers. Or is the
> assumption that all drivers call dma_set_mask() faulty?
That was the assumption behind the code, but the assumption is wrong.
Alex is working on a fix.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists