[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240509143635.GD374370@cmpxchg.org>
Date: Thu, 9 May 2024 10:36:35 -0400
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
To: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@...ux.dev>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH rfc 0/9] mm: memcg: separate legacy cgroup v1 code and
put under config option
On Thu, May 09, 2024 at 10:22:10AM -0400, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 08:41:29PM -0700, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> > 3) Is it better to use a new include/linux/memcontrol-v1.h instead of
> > mm/internal.h? Or mm/memcontrol-v1.h.
>
> mm/memcontrol-v1.h sounds good to me.
Argh, there is a folio_memcg_lock() callsite in fs/buffer.c. I suppose
include/linux/memcontrol-v1.h makes the most sense then.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists