linux-kernel - [PATCH] soc: qcom: rpmh-rsc: Ensure irqs aren't disabled by rpmh_rsc_send

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu,  9 May 2024 11:41:28 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
	patches@...ts.linux.dev,
	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
	Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Subject: [PATCH] soc: qcom: rpmh-rsc: Ensure irqs aren't disabled by rpmh_rsc_send_data() callers

Dan pointed out that Smatch is concerned about this code because it uses
spin_lock_irqsave() and then calls wait_event_lock_irq() which enables
irqs before going to sleep. The comment above the function says it
should be called with interrupts enabled, but we simply hope that's true
without really confirming that. Let's add a might_sleep() here to
confirm that interrupts and preemption aren't disabled. Once we do that,
we can change the lock to be non-saving, spin_lock_irq(), to clarify
that we don't expect irqs to be disabled. If irqs are disabled by
callers they're going to be enabled anyway in the wait_event_lock_irq()
call which would be bad.

This should make Smatch happier and find bad callers faster with the
might_sleep(). We can drop the WARN_ON() in the caller because we have
the might_sleep() now, simplifying the code.

Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/911181ed-c430-4592-ad26-4dc948834e08@moroto.mountain
Fixes: 2bc20f3c8487 ("soc: qcom: rpmh-rsc: Sleep waiting for tcs slots to be free")
Cc: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
---
 drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c | 7 ++++---
 drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh.c     | 1 -
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c
index a021dc71807b..568d0b8c52d6 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c
@@ -645,13 +645,14 @@ int rpmh_rsc_send_data(struct rsc_drv *drv, const struct tcs_request *msg)
 {
 	struct tcs_group *tcs;
 	int tcs_id;
-	unsigned long flags;
+
+	might_sleep();
 
 	tcs = get_tcs_for_msg(drv, msg);
 	if (IS_ERR(tcs))
 		return PTR_ERR(tcs);
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&drv->lock, flags);
+	spin_lock_irq(&drv->lock);
 
 	/* Wait forever for a free tcs. It better be there eventually! */
 	wait_event_lock_irq(drv->tcs_wait,
@@ -669,7 +670,7 @@ int rpmh_rsc_send_data(struct rsc_drv *drv, const struct tcs_request *msg)
 		write_tcs_reg_sync(drv, drv->regs[RSC_DRV_CMD_ENABLE], tcs_id, 0);
 		enable_tcs_irq(drv, tcs_id, true);
 	}
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&drv->lock, flags);
+	spin_unlock_irq(&drv->lock);
 
 	/*
 	 * These two can be done after the lock is released because:
diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh.c
index 9f26d7f9b9dc..8903ed956312 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh.c
@@ -183,7 +183,6 @@ static int __rpmh_write(const struct device *dev, enum rpmh_state state,
 	}
 
 	if (state == RPMH_ACTIVE_ONLY_STATE) {
-		WARN_ON(irqs_disabled());
 		ret = rpmh_rsc_send_data(ctrlr_to_drv(ctrlr), &rpm_msg->msg);
 	} else {
 		/* Clean up our call by spoofing tx_done */

base-commit: 4cece764965020c22cff7665b18a012006359095
-- 
https://chromeos.dev