[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2125dda3-829c-4113-988c-3c5861127f97@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 9 May 2024 13:18:02 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: "T.J. Mercier" <tjmercier@...gle.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
x86@...nel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: petr@...arici.cz, mhklinux@...look.com, robin.murphy@....com,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] doc: swiotlb: iommu/dma: Clarify swiotlb=force
option applies only to dma-direct
So, I know get_maintainer.pl doesn't work great for files that are used
by a lot of subsystems, but it doesn't seem _super_ hard to find
relevant maintainers for this stuff.
There are many IOMMU and swiotlb folks in MAINTAINERS who aren't cc'd
here. I'd be great to get an ack from those folks.
iommu@...ts.linux.dev seems to pop up pretty frequently.
I'd also have zero objections to a patch to:
Documentation/arch/x86/x86_64/boot-options.rst
that goes through another tree.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists