| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <7bbc6ffa-6add-4b67-9bc9-533d79af942a@gmx.net>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2024 21:22:18 +0200
From: Stefan Wahren <wahrenst@....net>
To: Andrea della Porta <andrea.porta@...e.com>, Rob Herring
<robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>, Ray Jui
<rjui@...adcom.com>, Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
Broadcom internal kernel review list
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>, Ulf Hansson
<ulf.hansson@...aro.org>, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Kamal Dasu <kamal.dasu@...adcom.com>, Al Cooper <alcooperx@...il.com>,
Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] mmc: sdhci-brcmstb: Add BCM2712 support
Hi Andrea,
Am 10.05.24 um 16:35 schrieb Andrea della Porta:
> Broadcom BCM2712 SoC has an SDHCI card controller using the SDIO CFG
> register block present on other STB chips. Add support for BCM2712
> SD capabilities of this chipset.
> The silicon is SD Express capable but this driver port does not currently
> include that feature yet.
> Based on downstream driver by raspberry foundation maintained kernel.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrea della Porta <andrea.porta@...e.com>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-brcmstb.c | 81 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 81 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-brcmstb.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-brcmstb.c
> index 9053526fa212..13a1017d53c5 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-brcmstb.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-brcmstb.c
> @@ -30,6 +30,24 @@
>
> #define SDHCI_ARASAN_CQE_BASE_ADDR 0x200
>
> +#define SDIO_CFG_CQ_CAPABILITY 0x4c
> +#define SDIO_CFG_CQ_CAPABILITY_FMUL GENMASK(13, 12)
> +
> +#define SDIO_CFG_CTRL 0x0
> +#define SDIO_CFG_CTRL_SDCD_N_TEST_EN BIT(31)
> +#define SDIO_CFG_CTRL_SDCD_N_TEST_LEV BIT(30)
> +
> +#define SDIO_CFG_MAX_50MHZ_MODE 0x1ac
> +#define SDIO_CFG_MAX_50MHZ_MODE_STRAP_OVERRIDE BIT(31)
> +#define SDIO_CFG_MAX_50MHZ_MODE_ENABLE BIT(0)
> +
> +#define MMC_CAP_HSE_MASK (MMC_CAP2_HS200_1_8V_SDR | \
> + MMC_CAP2_HS200_1_2V_SDR | \
> + MMC_CAP2_HS400_1_8V | \
> + MMC_CAP2_HS400_1_2V)
This could be simplified either with MMC_CAP2_HSX00_1_2V |
MMC_CAP2_HSX00_1_8V or MMC_CAP2_HS200 | MMC_CAP2_HS400
> +
> +#define MMC_CAP_UHS_MASK (MMC_CAP_UHS_SDR50 | MMC_CAP_UHS_SDR104)
There is already a MMC_CAP_UHS define, but according to the code this is
not intended. It looks more like a mask of all UHS modes equal and above
50 MHz. The name or at least a comment should reflect this.
> +
> struct sdhci_brcmstb_priv {
> void __iomem *cfg_regs;
> unsigned int flags;
> @@ -38,6 +56,7 @@ struct sdhci_brcmstb_priv {
> };
>
> struct brcmstb_match_priv {
> + void (*cfginit)(struct sdhci_host *host);
> void (*hs400es)(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_ios *ios);
> struct sdhci_ops *ops;
> const unsigned int flags;
> @@ -139,6 +158,17 @@ static void sdhci_brcmstb_set_clock(struct sdhci_host *host, unsigned int clock)
> sdhci_enable_clk(host, clk);
> }
>
> +static void sdhci_brcmstb_set_power(struct sdhci_host *host, unsigned char mode,
> + unsigned short vdd)
> +{
> + struct mmc_host *mmc = host->mmc;
> +
> + if (!IS_ERR(mmc->supply.vmmc))
> + mmc_regulator_set_ocr(mmc, mmc->supply.vmmc, vdd);
> +
> + sdhci_set_power_noreg(host, mode, vdd);
> +}
> +
> static void sdhci_brcmstb_set_uhs_signaling(struct sdhci_host *host,
> unsigned int timing)
> {
> @@ -168,6 +198,40 @@ static void sdhci_brcmstb_set_uhs_signaling(struct sdhci_host *host,
> sdhci_writew(host, ctrl_2, SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2);
> }
>
> +static void sdhci_brcmstb_cfginit_2712(struct sdhci_host *host)
> +{
> + struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
> + struct sdhci_brcmstb_priv *brcmstb_priv = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host);
> + u32 hsemmc_mask = MMC_CAP_HSE_MASK;
> + u32 uhs_mask = MMC_CAP_UHS_MASK;
> + u32 reg, base_clk_mhz;
> +
> + /*
> + * If we support a speed that requires tuning,
> + * then select the delay line PHY as the clock source.
> + */
> + if ((host->mmc->caps & uhs_mask) || (host->mmc->caps2 & hsemmc_mask)) {
> + reg = readl(brcmstb_priv->cfg_regs + SDIO_CFG_MAX_50MHZ_MODE);
> + reg &= ~SDIO_CFG_MAX_50MHZ_MODE_ENABLE;
> + reg |= SDIO_CFG_MAX_50MHZ_MODE_STRAP_OVERRIDE;
> + writel(reg, brcmstb_priv->cfg_regs + SDIO_CFG_MAX_50MHZ_MODE);
> + }
> +
> + if ((host->mmc->caps & MMC_CAP_NONREMOVABLE) ||
> + (host->mmc->caps & MMC_CAP_NEEDS_POLL)) {
> + /* Force presence */
> + reg = readl(brcmstb_priv->cfg_regs + SDIO_CFG_CTRL);
> + reg &= ~SDIO_CFG_CTRL_SDCD_N_TEST_LEV;
> + reg |= SDIO_CFG_CTRL_SDCD_N_TEST_EN;
> + writel(reg, brcmstb_priv->cfg_regs + SDIO_CFG_CTRL);
> + }
> +
> + /* Guesstimate the timer frequency (controller base clock) */
> + base_clk_mhz = max_t(u32, clk_get_rate(pltfm_host->clk) / (1000 * 1000), 1);
> + reg = SDIO_CFG_CQ_CAPABILITY_FMUL | base_clk_mhz;
> + writel(reg, brcmstb_priv->cfg_regs + SDIO_CFG_CQ_CAPABILITY);
> +}
> +
> static void sdhci_brcmstb_dumpregs(struct mmc_host *mmc)
> {
> sdhci_dumpregs(mmc_priv(mmc));
> @@ -200,6 +264,14 @@ static struct sdhci_ops sdhci_brcmstb_ops = {
> .set_uhs_signaling = sdhci_set_uhs_signaling,
> };
>
> +static struct sdhci_ops sdhci_brcmstb_ops_2712 = {
> + .set_clock = sdhci_set_clock,
> + .set_power = sdhci_brcmstb_set_power,
> + .set_bus_width = sdhci_set_bus_width,
> + .reset = sdhci_reset,
> + .set_uhs_signaling = sdhci_set_uhs_signaling,
> +};
> +
> static struct sdhci_ops sdhci_brcmstb_ops_7216 = {
> .set_clock = sdhci_brcmstb_set_clock,
> .set_bus_width = sdhci_set_bus_width,
> @@ -214,6 +286,11 @@ static struct sdhci_ops sdhci_brcmstb_ops_74165b0 = {
> .set_uhs_signaling = sdhci_brcmstb_set_uhs_signaling,
> };
>
> +static const struct brcmstb_match_priv match_priv_2712 = {
> + .cfginit = sdhci_brcmstb_cfginit_2712,
> + .ops = &sdhci_brcmstb_ops_2712,
> +};
> +
> static struct brcmstb_match_priv match_priv_7425 = {
> .flags = BRCMSTB_MATCH_FLAGS_NO_64BIT |
> BRCMSTB_MATCH_FLAGS_BROKEN_TIMEOUT,
> @@ -238,6 +315,7 @@ static struct brcmstb_match_priv match_priv_74165b0 = {
> };
>
> static const struct of_device_id __maybe_unused sdhci_brcm_of_match[] = {
> + { .compatible = "brcm,bcm2712-sdhci", .data = &match_priv_2712 },
> { .compatible = "brcm,bcm7425-sdhci", .data = &match_priv_7425 },
> { .compatible = "brcm,bcm7445-sdhci", .data = &match_priv_7445 },
> { .compatible = "brcm,bcm7216-sdhci", .data = &match_priv_7216 },
> @@ -370,6 +448,9 @@ static int sdhci_brcmstb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> (host->mmc->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_HS400_ES))
> host->mmc_host_ops.hs400_enhanced_strobe = match_priv->hs400es;
>
> + if (match_priv->cfginit)
> + match_priv->cfginit(host);
> +
> /*
> * Supply the existing CAPS, but clear the UHS modes. This
> * will allow these modes to be specified by device tree
Powered by blists - more mailing lists