linux-kernel - [PATCH v15 22/23] KVM: SEV: Fix return code interpretation for RMP nested page faults

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 9 May 2024 20:58:21 -0500
From: Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>
To: <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	<linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>, <x86@...nel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <tglx@...utronix.de>, <mingo@...hat.com>,
	<jroedel@...e.de>, <thomas.lendacky@....com>, <hpa@...or.com>,
	<ardb@...nel.org>, <pbonzini@...hat.com>, <seanjc@...gle.com>,
	<vkuznets@...hat.com>, <jmattson@...gle.com>, <luto@...nel.org>,
	<dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, <slp@...hat.com>, <pgonda@...gle.com>,
	<peterz@...radead.org>, <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
	<rientjes@...gle.com>, <dovmurik@...ux.ibm.com>, <tobin@....com>,
	<bp@...en8.de>, <vbabka@...e.cz>, <kirill@...temov.name>,
	<ak@...ux.intel.com>, <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>, <alpergun@...gle.com>,
	<jarkko@...nel.org>, <ashish.kalra@....com>, <nikunj.dadhania@....com>,
	<pankaj.gupta@....com>, <liam.merwick@...cle.com>, <papaluri@....com>
Subject: [PATCH v15 22/23] KVM: SEV: Fix return code interpretation for RMP nested page faults

The intended logic when handling #NPFs with the RMP bit set (31) is to
first check to see if the #NPF requires a shared<->private transition
and, if so, to go ahead and let the corresponding KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT
get forwarded on to userspace before proceeding with any handling of
other potential RMP fault conditions like needing to PSMASH the RMP
entry/etc (which will be done later if the guest still re-faults after
the KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT is processed by userspace).

The determination of whether any userspace handling of
KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT is needed is done by interpreting the return code
of kvm_mmu_page_fault(). However, the current code misinterprets the
return code, expecting 0 to indicate a userspace exit rather than less
than 0 (-EFAULT). This leads to the following unexpected behavior:

  - for KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULTs resulting for implicit shared->private
    conversions, warnings get printed from sev_handle_rmp_fault()
    because it does not expect to be called for GPAs where
    KVM_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTE_PRIVATE is not set. Standard linux guests don't
    generally do this, but it is allowed and should be handled
    similarly to private->shared conversions rather than triggering any
    sort of warnings

  - if gmem support for 2MB folios is enabled (via currently out-of-tree
    code), implicit shared<->private conversions will always result in
    a PSMASH being attempted, even if it's not actually needed to
    resolve the RMP fault. This doesn't cause any harm, but results in a
    needless PSMASH and zapping of the sPTE

Resolve these issues by calling sev_handle_rmp_fault() only when
kvm_mmu_page_fault()'s return code is greater than or equal to 0,
indicating a KVM_MEMORY_EXIT_FAULT/-EFAULT isn't needed. While here,
simplify the code slightly and fix up the associated comments for better
clarity.

Fixes: ccc9d836c5c3 ("KVM: SEV: Add support to handle RMP nested page faults")

Signed-off-by: Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 10 ++++------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
index 426ad49325d7..9431ce74c7d4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
@@ -2070,14 +2070,12 @@ static int npf_interception(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 				svm->vmcb->control.insn_len);
 
 	/*
-	 * rc == 0 indicates a userspace exit is needed to handle page
-	 * transitions, so do that first before updating the RMP table.
+	 * rc < 0 indicates a userspace exit may be needed to handle page
+	 * attribute updates, so deal with that first before handling other
+	 * potential RMP fault conditions.
 	 */
-	if (error_code & PFERR_GUEST_RMP_MASK) {
-		if (rc == 0)
-			return rc;
+	if (rc >= 0 && error_code & PFERR_GUEST_RMP_MASK)
 		sev_handle_rmp_fault(vcpu, fault_address, error_code);
-	}
 
 	return rc;
 }
-- 
2.25.1