linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH rfc 0/9] mm: memcg: separate legacy cgroup v1 code and put under config option

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 10 May 2024 10:10:03 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@...ux.dev>,
	Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gthelen@...gle.coma,
	Chris Li <chriscli@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rfc 0/9] mm: memcg: separate legacy cgroup v1 code and
 put under config option

On Thu 09-05-24 19:59:19, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Wed, 8 May 2024, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> 
> > Hi Roman,
> > 
> > A very timely and important topic and we should definitely talk about it
> > during LSFMM as well. I have been thinking about this problem for quite
> > sometime and I am getting more and more convinced that we should aim to
> > completely deprecate memcg-v1.
> > 
> 
> I think this would be a very worthwhile discussion at LSF/MM, I'm not sure 
> if it would be too late for someone to make a formal proposal for it to be 
> included in the schedule.  Michal would know if there is a opportunity.

yes, I think we can and should have this discussion. I will put that on
the schedule. I will reference this email thread as a topic proposal
with Shakeel and Roman to lead the session.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs