linux-kernel - [PATCH v3] module: create weak dependecies

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240510085726.327831-1-jtornosm@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2024 10:57:22 +0200
From: Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez <jtornosm@...hat.com>
To: mcgrof@...nel.org,
	linux-modules@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: lucas.demarchi@...el.com,
	Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez <jtornosm@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3] module: create weak dependecies

It has been seen that for some network mac drivers (i.e. lan78xx) the
related module for the phy is loaded dynamically depending on the current
hardware. In this case, the associated phy is read using mdio bus and then
the associated phy module is loaded during runtime (kernel function
phy_request_driver_module). However, no software dependency is defined, so
the user tools will no be able to get this dependency. For example, if
dracut is used and the hardware is present, lan78xx will be included but no
phy module will be added, and in the next restart the device will not work
from boot because no related phy will be found during initramfs stage.

In order to solve this, we could define a normal 'pre' software dependency
in lan78xx module with all the possible phy modules (there may be some),
but proceeding in that way, all the possible phy modules would be loaded
while only one is necessary.

The idea is to create a new type of dependency, that we are going to call
'weak' to be used only by the user tools that need to detect this situation.
In that way, for example, dracut could check the 'weak' dependency of the
modules involved in order to install these dependencies in initramfs too.
That is, for the commented lan78xx module, defining the 'weak' dependency
with the possible phy modules list, only the necessary phy would be loaded
on demand keeping the same behavior, but all the possible phy modules would
be available from initramfs.

The 'weak' dependency support has been included in kmod:
https://github.com/kmod-project/kmod/commit/05828b4a6e9327a63ef94df544a042b5e9ce4fe7
But, take into account that this can only be used if depmod is new enough.
If it isn't, depmod will have the same behavior as always (keeping backward
compatibility) and the information for the 'weak' dependency will not be
provided.

Signed-off-by: Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez <jtornosm@...hat.com>
---
V2 -> V3:
- Include note about backward compatibility.
- Balance the /* and */.
V1 -> V2:
- Include reference to 'weak' dependency support in kmod.

 include/linux/module.h | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/linux/module.h b/include/linux/module.h
index 1153b0d99a80..2a056017df5b 100644
--- a/include/linux/module.h
+++ b/include/linux/module.h
@@ -173,6 +173,12 @@ extern void cleanup_module(void);
  */
 #define MODULE_SOFTDEP(_softdep) MODULE_INFO(softdep, _softdep)

+/*
+ * Weak module dependencies. See man modprobe.d for details.
+ * Example: MODULE_WEAKDEP("module-foo")
+ */
+#define MODULE_WEAKDEP(_weakdep) MODULE_INFO(weakdep, _weakdep)
+
 /*
  * MODULE_FILE is used for generating modules.builtin
  * So, make it no-op when this is being built as a module
-- 
2.44.0