[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c30ebad2-1ad3-4b58-afaf-e6dc32c091fc@suse.com>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2024 11:53:45 +0200
From: Jürgen Groß <jgross@...e.com>
To: "Chen, Jiqian" <Jiqian.Chen@....com>
Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, "Rafael J . Wysocki"
<rafael@...nel.org>, Roger Pau Monné
<roger.pau@...rix.com>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"Huang, Ray" <Ray.Huang@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC KERNEL PATCH v6 3/3] xen/privcmd: Add new syscall to get gsi
from irq
On 10.05.24 11:06, Chen, Jiqian wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2024/5/10 14:46, Jürgen Groß wrote:
>> On 19.04.24 05:36, Jiqian Chen wrote:
>>> +
>>> + info->type = IRQT_PIRQ;
> I am considering whether I need to use a new type(like IRQT_GSI) here to distinguish with IRQT_PIRQ, because function restore_pirqs will process all IRQT_PIRQ.
restore_pirqs() already considers gsi == 0 to be not GSI related. Isn't this
enough?
Juergen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists