[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b49a7014-163d-4805-8580-da2802311f26@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2024 01:05:04 +0100
From: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
To: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@...omium.org>,
Michael Tretter <m.tretter@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@....com>, Andy Walls <awalls@...metrocast.net>,
Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.k.varbanov@...il.com>,
Vikash Garodia <quic_vgarodia@...cinc.com>,
Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 16/18] media: venus: Refactor hfi_sys_get_property_pkt
On 07/05/2024 17:27, Ricardo Ribalda wrote:
> -struct hfi_sys_get_property_pkt {
> +struct hfi_sys_get_version_pkt {
> struct hfi_pkt_hdr hdr;
> - u32 num_properties;
Disagree with the structure name change - the structure describes the
packet which in this case is a get property packet. The data field
identifies the packet to the firmware.
If I were to end up reading kernel code and firmware code it is easier
on the programmer to match both ends of the protocol with a common
namespace.
Please retain the name of the packet `hfi_sys_get_property_pkt` and the
existing `num_countsathing` in this driver keeping `num_properites`
---
bod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists