| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <202405101833.EmbmRFbl-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2024 19:15:39 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Yabin Cui <yabinc@...gle.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
Yabin Cui <yabinc@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] perf: core: Check sample_type in
perf_sample_save_brstack
Hi Yabin,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on perf-tools-next/perf-tools-next]
[also build test ERROR on tip/perf/core linus/master v6.9-rc7 next-20240510]
[cannot apply to acme/perf/core]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Yabin-Cui/perf-core-Save-raw-sample-data-conditionally-based-on-sample-type/20240510-083817
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/perf/perf-tools-next.git perf-tools-next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240510002424.1277314-4-yabinc%40google.com
patch subject: [PATCH v3 3/3] perf: core: Check sample_type in perf_sample_save_brstack
config: x86_64-buildonly-randconfig-001-20240510 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240510/202405101833.EmbmRFbl-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-13 (Ubuntu 13.2.0-4ubuntu3) 13.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240510/202405101833.EmbmRFbl-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202405101833.EmbmRFbl-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from include/linux/trace_events.h:10,
from include/trace/syscall.h:7,
from include/linux/syscalls.h:93,
from kernel/time/itimer.c:10:
include/linux/perf_event.h: In function 'perf_sample_save_brstack':
>> include/linux/perf_event.h:1279:14: error: implicit declaration of function 'has_branch_stack' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
1279 | if (!has_branch_stack(event))
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/perf_event.h: At top level:
>> include/linux/perf_event.h:1671:20: error: conflicting types for 'has_branch_stack'; have 'bool(struct perf_event *)' {aka '_Bool(struct perf_event *)'}
1671 | static inline bool has_branch_stack(struct perf_event *event)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/perf_event.h:1279:14: note: previous implicit declaration of 'has_branch_stack' with type 'int()'
1279 | if (!has_branch_stack(event))
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
--
In file included from include/linux/trace_events.h:10,
from include/trace/syscall.h:7,
from include/linux/syscalls.h:93,
from kernel/time/hrtimer.c:30:
include/linux/perf_event.h: In function 'perf_sample_save_brstack':
>> include/linux/perf_event.h:1279:14: error: implicit declaration of function 'has_branch_stack' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
1279 | if (!has_branch_stack(event))
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/perf_event.h: At top level:
>> include/linux/perf_event.h:1671:20: error: conflicting types for 'has_branch_stack'; have 'bool(struct perf_event *)' {aka '_Bool(struct perf_event *)'}
1671 | static inline bool has_branch_stack(struct perf_event *event)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/perf_event.h:1279:14: note: previous implicit declaration of 'has_branch_stack' with type 'int()'
1279 | if (!has_branch_stack(event))
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/time/hrtimer.c:121:35: warning: initialized field overwritten [-Woverride-init]
121 | [CLOCK_REALTIME] = HRTIMER_BASE_REALTIME,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/time/hrtimer.c:121:35: note: (near initialization for 'hrtimer_clock_to_base_table[0]')
kernel/time/hrtimer.c:122:35: warning: initialized field overwritten [-Woverride-init]
122 | [CLOCK_MONOTONIC] = HRTIMER_BASE_MONOTONIC,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/time/hrtimer.c:122:35: note: (near initialization for 'hrtimer_clock_to_base_table[1]')
kernel/time/hrtimer.c:123:35: warning: initialized field overwritten [-Woverride-init]
123 | [CLOCK_BOOTTIME] = HRTIMER_BASE_BOOTTIME,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/time/hrtimer.c:123:35: note: (near initialization for 'hrtimer_clock_to_base_table[7]')
kernel/time/hrtimer.c:124:35: warning: initialized field overwritten [-Woverride-init]
124 | [CLOCK_TAI] = HRTIMER_BASE_TAI,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/time/hrtimer.c:124:35: note: (near initialization for 'hrtimer_clock_to_base_table[11]')
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
vim +/has_branch_stack +1279 include/linux/perf_event.h
1271
1272 static inline void perf_sample_save_brstack(struct perf_sample_data *data,
1273 struct perf_event *event,
1274 struct perf_branch_stack *brs,
1275 u64 *brs_cntr)
1276 {
1277 int size = sizeof(u64); /* nr */
1278
> 1279 if (!has_branch_stack(event))
1280 return;
1281
1282 if (branch_sample_hw_index(event))
1283 size += sizeof(u64);
1284 size += brs->nr * sizeof(struct perf_branch_entry);
1285
1286 /*
1287 * The extension space for counters is appended after the
1288 * struct perf_branch_stack. It is used to store the occurrences
1289 * of events of each branch.
1290 */
1291 if (brs_cntr)
1292 size += brs->nr * sizeof(u64);
1293
1294 data->br_stack = brs;
1295 data->br_stack_cntr = brs_cntr;
1296 data->dyn_size += size;
1297 data->sample_flags |= PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_STACK;
1298 }
1299
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists