[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<IA1PR20MB49539EF552099FD466E38D6ABBE72@IA1PR20MB4953.namprd20.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2024 19:19:49 +0800
From: Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@...look.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@...look.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Chen Wang <unicorn_wang@...look.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>,
Liu Gui <kenneth.liu@...hgo.com>, Jingbao Qiu <qiujingbao.dlmu@...il.com>, dlan@...too.org,
linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: phy: Add Sophgo CV1800 USB phy
On Tue, May 07, 2024 at 02:08:29PM GMT, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, May 06, 2024 at 08:17:30PM +0800, Inochi Amaoto wrote:
> > On Mon, May 06, 2024 at 08:51:59AM GMT, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > On 05/05/2024 03:52, Inochi Amaoto wrote:
> > > > The USB phy of Sophgo CV18XX series SoC needs to sense a pin called
> > > > "VBUS_DET" to get the right operation mode. If this pin is not
> > > > connected, it only supports setting the mode manually.
> > > >
> > > > Add USB phy bindings for Sophgo CV18XX/SG200X series SoC.
> > >
> > > ...
> > >
> > > > +
> > > > + clock-names:
> > > > + items:
> > > > + - const: phy
> > > > + - const: app
> > > > + - const: stb
> > > > + - const: lpm
> > > > +
> > > > + vbus_det-gpios:
> > >
> > > No underscores.
> > >
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > > > + description: GPIO to the USB OTG VBUS detect pin. This should not be
> > > > + defined if vbus_det pin and switch pin are connected, which may
> > > > + break the VBUS detection.
> > >
> > > Why is this property of the PHY? VBUS pin goes to the connector, doesn't
> > > it? It looks like you combined two or three (!!!) bindings into one.
> > >
> >
> > Yes, but I am not sure which is the best to write this bindings.
> > The topology of USB likes this:
> >
> > controller -- phy -- switch --> (host) port/hub
> > --> (device) port
> >
> > The vbus-detect connect to the device port, but it will change the mode for
> > both phy and switch. And the switch is just a switching circuit.
> > I am pretty confused on how to split this binding. I think it may like the
> > following:
> >
> > phy {
> > switch {
> > /* This is the switch in the follows */
> > connector1 {
> > /* host port */
> > };
> > connector2 {
> > /* device port*/
> > /* the vbus pin is here */
> > };
> > };
> > };
> >
> > Could you share some suggestion on this?
>
> Something like the above assuming 2 physical connectors, but probably
> should be a child of the USB controller or on its own. PHYs usually
> aren't put into a parent/child hierarchy, but are out of band.
>
Yes, your are right. I should add port definition under the controller.
> Is this switch implemented on the board level? If so, you should create
> something that would work on any platform with a GPIO controlled USB
> switch like this.
>
> Rob
Yes, the switch is FSUSB30UMX. If I understand you correctly, I need to
add a driver to control this switch, right?
Regards,
Inochi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists