linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/4] selftests/bpf: Add some null pointer checks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 10 May 2024 16:20:47 +0500
From: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>
To: kunwu.chan@...ux.dev, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
 andrii@...nel.org, martin.lau@...ux.dev, eddyz87@...il.com, song@...nel.org,
 yonghong.song@...ux.dev, john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org,
 sdf@...gle.com, haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org, mykolal@...com,
 shuah@...nel.org, kunwu.chan@...mail.com
Cc: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 Kunwu Chan <chentao@...inos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/4] selftests/bpf: Add some null pointer
 checks

On 5/10/24 2:58 PM, kunwu.chan@...ux.dev wrote:
> From: Kunwu Chan <chentao@...inos.cn>
> 
> There is a 'malloc' call, which can be unsuccessful.
> This patch will add the malloc failure checking
> to avoid possible null dereference.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kunwu Chan <chentao@...inos.cn>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c | 7 +++++++
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c
> index 89ff704e9dad..ecc3ddeceeeb 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c
> @@ -582,6 +582,11 @@ int compare_stack_ips(int smap_fd, int amap_fd, int stack_trace_len)
>  
>  	val_buf1 = malloc(stack_trace_len);
>  	val_buf2 = malloc(stack_trace_len);
> +	if (!val_buf1 || !val_buf2) {
> +		err = -ENOMEM;
Return from here instead of going to out where free(val_buf*) is being called.

> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
>  	cur_key_p = NULL;
>  	next_key_p = &key;
>  	while (bpf_map_get_next_key(smap_fd, cur_key_p, next_key_p) == 0) {
> @@ -1197,6 +1202,8 @@ static int dispatch_thread_send_subtests(int sock_fd, struct test_state *state)
>  	int subtest_num = state->subtest_num;
>  
>  	state->subtest_states = malloc(subtest_num * sizeof(*subtest_state));
> +	if (!state->subtest_states)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
>  
>  	for (int i = 0; i < subtest_num; i++) {
>  		subtest_state = &state->subtest_states[i];

-- 
BR,
Muhammad Usama Anjum