lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240510114747.21548-13-ryncsn@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2024 19:47:47 +0800
From: Kairui Song <ryncsn@...il.com>
To: linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
	Chris Li <chrisl@...nel.org>,
	Barry Song <v-songbaohua@...o.com>,
	Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>,
	Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
	Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Kairui Song <kasong@...cent.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 12/12] mm/swap: reduce swap cache search space

From: Kairui Song <kasong@...cent.com>

Currently we use one swap_address_space for every 64M chunk to reduce lock
contention, this is like having a set of smaller swap files inside one
swap device. But when doing swap cache look up or insert, we are
still using the offset of the whole large swap device. This is OK for
correctness, as the offset (key) is unique.

But Xarray is specially optimized for small indexes, it creates the
radix tree levels lazily to be just enough to fit the largest key
stored in one Xarray. So we are wasting tree nodes unnecessarily.

For 64M chunk it should only take at most 3 levels to contain everything.
But if we are using the offset from the whole swap device, the offset (key)
value will be way beyond 64M, and so will the tree level.

Optimize this by using a new helper swap_cache_index to get a swap
entry's unique offset in its own 64M swap_address_space.

I see a ~1% performance gain in benchmark and actual workload with
high memory pressure.

Test with `time memhog 128G` inside a 8G memcg using 128G swap (ramdisk
with SWP_SYNCHRONOUS_IO dropped, tested 3 times, results are stable. The
test result is similar but the improvement is smaller if SWP_SYNCHRONOUS_IO
is enabled, as swap out path can never skip swap cache):

Before:
6.07user 250.74system 4:17.26elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 8373376maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (55major+33555018minor)pagefaults 0swaps

After (1.8% faster):
6.08user 246.09system 4:12.58elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 8373248maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (54major+33555027minor)pagefaults 0swaps

Similar result with MySQL and sysbench using swap:
Before:
94055.61 qps

After (0.8% faster):
94834.91 qps

Radix tree slab usage is also very slightly lower.

Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@...cent.com>
---
 mm/huge_memory.c |  2 +-
 mm/memcontrol.c  |  2 +-
 mm/mincore.c     |  2 +-
 mm/shmem.c       |  2 +-
 mm/swap.h        | 15 +++++++++++++++
 mm/swap_state.c  | 17 +++++++++--------
 mm/swapfile.c    |  6 +++---
 7 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
index 317de2afd371..fcc0e86a2589 100644
--- a/mm/huge_memory.c
+++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
@@ -2838,7 +2838,7 @@ static void __split_huge_page(struct page *page, struct list_head *list,
 	split_page_memcg(head, order, new_order);
 
 	if (folio_test_anon(folio) && folio_test_swapcache(folio)) {
-		offset = swp_offset(folio->swap);
+		offset = swap_cache_index(folio->swap);
 		swap_cache = swap_address_space(folio->swap);
 		xa_lock(&swap_cache->i_pages);
 	}
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index d127c9c5fabf..024aeb64d0be 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -6153,7 +6153,7 @@ static struct page *mc_handle_swap_pte(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 	 * Because swap_cache_get_folio() updates some statistics counter,
 	 * we call find_get_page() with swapper_space directly.
 	 */
-	page = find_get_page(swap_address_space(ent), swp_offset(ent));
+	page = find_get_page(swap_address_space(ent), swap_cache_index(ent));
 	entry->val = ent.val;
 
 	return page;
diff --git a/mm/mincore.c b/mm/mincore.c
index dad3622cc963..e31cf1bde614 100644
--- a/mm/mincore.c
+++ b/mm/mincore.c
@@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ static int mincore_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
 			} else {
 #ifdef CONFIG_SWAP
 				*vec = mincore_page(swap_address_space(entry),
-						    swp_offset(entry));
+						    swap_cache_index(entry));
 #else
 				WARN_ON(1);
 				*vec = 1;
diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c
index fa2a0ed97507..326315c12feb 100644
--- a/mm/shmem.c
+++ b/mm/shmem.c
@@ -1756,7 +1756,7 @@ static int shmem_replace_folio(struct folio **foliop, gfp_t gfp,
 
 	old = *foliop;
 	entry = old->swap;
-	swap_index = swp_offset(entry);
+	swap_index = swap_cache_index(entry);
 	swap_mapping = swap_address_space(entry);
 
 	/*
diff --git a/mm/swap.h b/mm/swap.h
index 82023ab93205..2c0e96272d49 100644
--- a/mm/swap.h
+++ b/mm/swap.h
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ void __swap_writepage(struct folio *folio, struct writeback_control *wbc);
 /* One swap address space for each 64M swap space */
 #define SWAP_ADDRESS_SPACE_SHIFT	14
 #define SWAP_ADDRESS_SPACE_PAGES	(1 << SWAP_ADDRESS_SPACE_SHIFT)
+#define SWAP_ADDRESS_SPACE_MASK		(SWAP_ADDRESS_SPACE_PAGES - 1)
 extern struct address_space *swapper_spaces[];
 #define swap_address_space(entry)			    \
 	(&swapper_spaces[swp_type(entry)][swp_offset(entry) \
@@ -40,6 +41,15 @@ static inline loff_t swap_dev_pos(swp_entry_t entry)
 	return ((loff_t)swp_offset(entry)) << PAGE_SHIFT;
 }
 
+/*
+ * Return the swap cache index of the swap entry.
+ */
+static inline pgoff_t swap_cache_index(swp_entry_t entry)
+{
+	BUILD_BUG_ON((SWP_OFFSET_MASK | SWAP_ADDRESS_SPACE_MASK) != SWP_OFFSET_MASK);
+	return swp_offset(entry) & SWAP_ADDRESS_SPACE_MASK;
+}
+
 void show_swap_cache_info(void);
 bool add_to_swap(struct folio *folio);
 void *get_shadow_from_swap_cache(swp_entry_t entry);
@@ -86,6 +96,11 @@ static inline struct address_space *swap_address_space(swp_entry_t entry)
 	return NULL;
 }
 
+static inline pgoff_t swap_cache_index(swp_entry_t entry)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static inline void show_swap_cache_info(void)
 {
 }
diff --git a/mm/swap_state.c b/mm/swap_state.c
index 642c30d8376c..6e86c759dc1d 100644
--- a/mm/swap_state.c
+++ b/mm/swap_state.c
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ void show_swap_cache_info(void)
 void *get_shadow_from_swap_cache(swp_entry_t entry)
 {
 	struct address_space *address_space = swap_address_space(entry);
-	pgoff_t idx = swp_offset(entry);
+	pgoff_t idx = swap_cache_index(entry);
 	void *shadow;
 
 	shadow = xa_load(&address_space->i_pages, idx);
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ int add_to_swap_cache(struct folio *folio, swp_entry_t entry,
 			gfp_t gfp, void **shadowp)
 {
 	struct address_space *address_space = swap_address_space(entry);
-	pgoff_t idx = swp_offset(entry);
+	pgoff_t idx = swap_cache_index(entry);
 	XA_STATE_ORDER(xas, &address_space->i_pages, idx, folio_order(folio));
 	unsigned long i, nr = folio_nr_pages(folio);
 	void *old;
@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ void __delete_from_swap_cache(struct folio *folio,
 	struct address_space *address_space = swap_address_space(entry);
 	int i;
 	long nr = folio_nr_pages(folio);
-	pgoff_t idx = swp_offset(entry);
+	pgoff_t idx = swap_cache_index(entry);
 	XA_STATE(xas, &address_space->i_pages, idx);
 
 	xas_set_update(&xas, workingset_update_node);
@@ -253,13 +253,14 @@ void clear_shadow_from_swap_cache(int type, unsigned long begin,
 
 	for (;;) {
 		swp_entry_t entry = swp_entry(type, curr);
+		unsigned long index = curr & SWAP_ADDRESS_SPACE_MASK;
 		struct address_space *address_space = swap_address_space(entry);
-		XA_STATE(xas, &address_space->i_pages, curr);
+		XA_STATE(xas, &address_space->i_pages, index);
 
 		xas_set_update(&xas, workingset_update_node);
 
 		xa_lock_irq(&address_space->i_pages);
-		xas_for_each(&xas, old, end) {
+		xas_for_each(&xas, old, min(index + (end - curr), SWAP_ADDRESS_SPACE_PAGES)) {
 			if (!xa_is_value(old))
 				continue;
 			xas_store(&xas, NULL);
@@ -350,7 +351,7 @@ struct folio *swap_cache_get_folio(swp_entry_t entry,
 {
 	struct folio *folio;
 
-	folio = filemap_get_folio(swap_address_space(entry), swp_offset(entry));
+	folio = filemap_get_folio(swap_address_space(entry), swap_cache_index(entry));
 	if (!IS_ERR(folio)) {
 		bool vma_ra = swap_use_vma_readahead();
 		bool readahead;
@@ -420,7 +421,7 @@ struct folio *filemap_get_incore_folio(struct address_space *mapping,
 	si = get_swap_device(swp);
 	if (!si)
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
-	index = swp_offset(swp);
+	index = swap_cache_index(swp);
 	folio = filemap_get_folio(swap_address_space(swp), index);
 	put_swap_device(si);
 	return folio;
@@ -447,7 +448,7 @@ struct folio *__read_swap_cache_async(swp_entry_t entry, gfp_t gfp_mask,
 		 * that would confuse statistics.
 		 */
 		folio = filemap_get_folio(swap_address_space(entry),
-						swp_offset(entry));
+					  swap_cache_index(entry));
 		if (!IS_ERR(folio))
 			goto got_folio;
 
diff --git a/mm/swapfile.c b/mm/swapfile.c
index 0b0ae6e8c764..4f0e8b2ac8aa 100644
--- a/mm/swapfile.c
+++ b/mm/swapfile.c
@@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ static int __try_to_reclaim_swap(struct swap_info_struct *si,
 	struct folio *folio;
 	int ret = 0;
 
-	folio = filemap_get_folio(swap_address_space(entry), offset);
+	folio = filemap_get_folio(swap_address_space(entry), swap_cache_index(entry));
 	if (IS_ERR(folio))
 		return 0;
 	/*
@@ -2158,7 +2158,7 @@ static int try_to_unuse(unsigned int type)
 	       (i = find_next_to_unuse(si, i)) != 0) {
 
 		entry = swp_entry(type, i);
-		folio = filemap_get_folio(swap_address_space(entry), i);
+		folio = filemap_get_folio(swap_address_space(entry), swap_cache_index(entry));
 		if (IS_ERR(folio))
 			continue;
 
@@ -3476,7 +3476,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(swapcache_mapping);
 
 pgoff_t __folio_swap_cache_index(struct folio *folio)
 {
-	return swp_offset(folio->swap);
+	return swap_cache_index(folio->swap);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__folio_swap_cache_index);
 
-- 
2.45.0


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ