Message-ID: <fe5cc86b-43e0-4685-99e7-998e61db333f@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2024 19:09:07 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev, linux-mm@...ck.org,
 linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, jroedel@...e.de,
 thomas.lendacky@....com, hpa@...or.com, ardb@...nel.org, seanjc@...gle.com,
 vkuznets@...hat.com, jmattson@...gle.com, luto@...nel.org,
 dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, slp@...hat.com, pgonda@...gle.com,
 peterz@...radead.org, srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com,
 rientjes@...gle.com, dovmurik@...ux.ibm.com, tobin@....com, bp@...en8.de,
 vbabka@...e.cz, kirill@...temov.name, ak@...ux.intel.com,
 tony.luck@...el.com, sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com,
 alpergun@...gle.com, jarkko@...nel.org, ashish.kalra@....com,
 nikunj.dadhania@....com, pankaj.gupta@....com, liam.merwick@...cle.com,
 papaluri@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 23/23] KVM: SEV: Fix PSC handling for SMASH/UNSMASH
 and partial update ops

On 5/10/24 03:58, Michael Roth wrote:
> There are a few edge-cases that the current processing for GHCB PSC
> requests doesn't handle properly:
> 
>   - KVM properly ignores SMASH/UNSMASH ops when they are embedded in a
>     PSC request buffer which contains other PSC operations, but
>     inadvertantly forwards them to userspace as private->shared PSC
>     requests if they appear at the end of the buffer. Make sure these are
>     ignored instead, just like cases where they are not at the end of the
>     request buffer.
> 
>   - Current code handles non-zero 'cur_page' fields when they are at the
>     beginning of a new GPA range, but it is not handling properly when
>     iterating through subsequent entries which are otherwise part of a
>     contiguous range. Fix up the handling so that these entries are not
>     combined into a larger contiguous range that include unintended GPA
>     ranges and are instead processed later as the start of a new
>     contiguous range.
> 
>   - The page size variable used to track 2M entries in KVM for inflight PSCs
>     might be artifically set to a different value, which can lead to
>     unexpected values in the entry's final 'cur_page' update. Use the
>     entry's 'pagesize' field instead to determine what the value of
>     'cur_page' should be upon completion of processing.
> 
> While here, also add a small helper for clearing in-flight PSCs
> variables and fix up comments for better readability.
> 
> Fixes: 266205d810d2 ("KVM: SEV: Add support to handle Page State Change VMGEXIT")
> Signed-off-by: Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>

There are some more improvements that can be made to the readability of
the code... this one is already better than the patch is fixing up, but I
don't like the code that is in the loop even though it is unconditionally
followed by "break".

Here's my attempt at replacing this patch, which is really more of a
rewrite of the whole function...  Untested beyond compilation.

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
index 35f0bd91f92e..6e612789c35f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
@@ -3555,23 +3555,25 @@ struct psc_buffer {
  
  static int snp_begin_psc(struct vcpu_svm *svm, struct psc_buffer *psc);
  
-static int snp_complete_psc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+static void snp_complete_psc(struct vcpu_svm *svm, u64 psc_ret)
+{
+	svm->sev_es.psc_inflight = 0;
+	svm->sev_es.psc_idx = 0;
+	svm->sev_es.psc_2m = 0;
+	ghcb_set_sw_exit_info_2(svm->sev_es.ghcb, psc_ret);
+}
+
+static void __snp_complete_one_psc(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
  {
-	struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
  	struct psc_buffer *psc = svm->sev_es.ghcb_sa;
  	struct psc_entry *entries = psc->entries;
  	struct psc_hdr *hdr = &psc->hdr;
-	__u64 psc_ret;
  	__u16 idx;
  
-	if (vcpu->run->hypercall.ret) {
-		psc_ret = VMGEXIT_PSC_ERROR_GENERIC;
-		goto out_resume;
-	}
-
  	/*
  	 * Everything in-flight has been processed successfully. Update the
-	 * corresponding entries in the guest's PSC buffer.
+	 * corresponding entries in the guest's PSC buffer and zero out the
+	 * count of in-flight PSC entries.
  	 */
  	for (idx = svm->sev_es.psc_idx; svm->sev_es.psc_inflight;
  	     svm->sev_es.psc_inflight--, idx++) {
@@ -3581,17 +3583,22 @@ static int snp_complete_psc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
  	}
  
  	hdr->cur_entry = idx;
+}
+
+static int snp_complete_one_psc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
+	struct psc_buffer *psc = svm->sev_es.ghcb_sa;
+
+	if (vcpu->run->hypercall.ret) {
+		snp_complete_psc(svm, VMGEXIT_PSC_ERROR_GENERIC);
+		return 1; /* resume guest */
+	}
+
+	__snp_complete_one_psc(svm);
  
  	/* Handle the next range (if any). */
  	return snp_begin_psc(svm, psc);
-
-out_resume:
-	svm->sev_es.psc_idx = 0;
-	svm->sev_es.psc_inflight = 0;
-	svm->sev_es.psc_2m = false;
-	ghcb_set_sw_exit_info_2(svm->sev_es.ghcb, psc_ret);
-
-	return 1; /* resume guest */
  }
  
  static int snp_begin_psc(struct vcpu_svm *svm, struct psc_buffer *psc)
@@ -3601,18 +3608,20 @@ static int snp_begin_psc(struct vcpu_svm *svm, struct psc_buffer *psc)
  	struct psc_hdr *hdr = &psc->hdr;
  	struct psc_entry entry_start;
  	u16 idx, idx_start, idx_end;
-	__u64 psc_ret, gpa;
+	u64 gfn;
  	int npages;
-
-	/* There should be no other PSCs in-flight at this point. */
-	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(svm->sev_es.psc_inflight)) {
-		psc_ret = VMGEXIT_PSC_ERROR_GENERIC;
-		goto out_resume;
-	}
+	bool huge;
  
  	if (!(vcpu->kvm->arch.hypercall_exit_enabled & (1 << KVM_HC_MAP_GPA_RANGE))) {
-		psc_ret = VMGEXIT_PSC_ERROR_GENERIC;
-		goto out_resume;
+		snp_complete_psc(svm, VMGEXIT_PSC_ERROR_GENERIC);
+		return 1;
+	}
+
+next_range:
+	/* There should be no other PSCs in-flight at this point. */
+	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(svm->sev_es.psc_inflight)) {
+		snp_complete_psc(svm, VMGEXIT_PSC_ERROR_GENERIC);
+		return 1;
  	}
  
  	/*
@@ -3624,97 +3633,99 @@ static int snp_begin_psc(struct vcpu_svm *svm, struct psc_buffer *psc)
  	idx_end = hdr->end_entry;
  
  	if (idx_end >= VMGEXIT_PSC_MAX_COUNT) {
-		psc_ret = VMGEXIT_PSC_ERROR_INVALID_HDR;
-		goto out_resume;
-	}
-
-	/* Nothing more to process. */
-	if (idx_start > idx_end) {
-		psc_ret = 0;
-		goto out_resume;
+		snp_complete_psc(svm, VMGEXIT_PSC_ERROR_INVALID_HDR);
+		return 1;
  	}
  
  	/* Find the start of the next range which needs processing. */
  	for (idx = idx_start; idx <= idx_end; idx++, hdr->cur_entry++) {
-		__u16 cur_page;
-		gfn_t gfn;
-		bool huge;
-
  		entry_start = entries[idx];
-
-		/* Only private/shared conversions are currently supported. */
-		if (entry_start.operation != VMGEXIT_PSC_OP_PRIVATE &&
-		    entry_start.operation != VMGEXIT_PSC_OP_SHARED)
-			continue;
-
  		gfn = entry_start.gfn;
-		cur_page = entry_start.cur_page;
  		huge = entry_start.pagesize;
+		npages = huge ? 512 : 1;
  
-		if ((huge && (cur_page > 512 || !IS_ALIGNED(gfn, 512))) ||
-		    (!huge && cur_page > 1)) {
-			psc_ret = VMGEXIT_PSC_ERROR_INVALID_ENTRY;
-			goto out_resume;
+		if (entry_start.cur_page > npages || !IS_ALIGNED(gfn, npages)) {
+			snp_complete_psc(svm, VMGEXIT_PSC_ERROR_INVALID_ENTRY);
+			return 1;
  		}
  
+		if (entry_start.cur_page) {
+			/*
+			 * If this is a partially-completed 2M range, force 4K
+			 * handling for the remaining pages since they're effectively
+			 * split at this point. Subsequent code should ensure this
+			 * doesn't get combined with adjacent PSC entries where 2M
+			 * handling is still possible.
+			 */
+			npages -= entry_start.cur_page;
+			gfn += entry_start.cur_page;
+			huge = false;
+		}
+		if (npages)
+			break;
+
  		/* All sub-pages already processed. */
-		if ((huge && cur_page == 512) || (!huge && cur_page == 1))
-			continue;
-
-		/*
-		 * If this is a partially-completed 2M range, force 4K handling
-		 * for the remaining pages since they're effectively split at
-		 * this point. Subsequent code should ensure this doesn't get
-		 * combined with adjacent PSC entries where 2M handling is still
-		 * possible.
-		 */
-		svm->sev_es.psc_2m = cur_page ? false : huge;
-		svm->sev_es.psc_idx = idx;
-		svm->sev_es.psc_inflight = 1;
-
-		gpa = gfn_to_gpa(gfn + cur_page);
-		npages = huge ? 512 - cur_page : 1;
-		break;
  	}
  
+	if (idx > idx_end) {
+		/* Nothing more to process. */
+		snp_complete_psc(svm, 0);
+		return 1;
+	}
+
+	svm->sev_es.psc_2m = huge;
+	svm->sev_es.psc_idx = idx;
+	svm->sev_es.psc_inflight = 1;
+
  	/*
  	 * Find all subsequent PSC entries that contain adjacent GPA
  	 * ranges/operations and can be combined into a single
  	 * KVM_HC_MAP_GPA_RANGE exit.
  	 */
-	for (idx = svm->sev_es.psc_idx + 1; idx <= idx_end; idx++) {
+	while (++idx <= idx_end) {
  		struct psc_entry entry = entries[idx];
  
  		if (entry.operation != entry_start.operation ||
-		    entry.gfn != entry_start.gfn + npages ||
-		    !!entry.pagesize != svm->sev_es.psc_2m)
+		    entry.gfn != gfn + npages ||
+		    entry.cur_page ||
+		    !!entry.pagesize != huge)
  			break;
  
  		svm->sev_es.psc_inflight++;
-		npages += entry_start.pagesize ? 512 : 1;
+		npages += huge ? 512 : 1;
  	}
  
-	vcpu->run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_HYPERCALL;
-	vcpu->run->hypercall.nr = KVM_HC_MAP_GPA_RANGE;
-	vcpu->run->hypercall.args[0] = gpa;
-	vcpu->run->hypercall.args[1] = npages;
-	vcpu->run->hypercall.args[2] = entry_start.operation == VMGEXIT_PSC_OP_PRIVATE
-				       ? KVM_MAP_GPA_RANGE_ENCRYPTED
-				       : KVM_MAP_GPA_RANGE_DECRYPTED;
-	vcpu->run->hypercall.args[2] |= entry_start.pagesize
-					? KVM_MAP_GPA_RANGE_PAGE_SZ_2M
-					: KVM_MAP_GPA_RANGE_PAGE_SZ_4K;
-	vcpu->arch.complete_userspace_io = snp_complete_psc;
+	switch (entry_start.operation) {
+	case VMGEXIT_PSC_OP_PRIVATE:
+	case VMGEXIT_PSC_OP_SHARED:
+		vcpu->run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_HYPERCALL;
+		vcpu->run->hypercall.nr = KVM_HC_MAP_GPA_RANGE;
+		vcpu->run->hypercall.args[0] = gfn_to_gpa(gfn);
+		vcpu->run->hypercall.args[1] = npages;
+		vcpu->run->hypercall.args[2] = entry_start.operation == VMGEXIT_PSC_OP_PRIVATE
+			? KVM_MAP_GPA_RANGE_ENCRYPTED
+			: KVM_MAP_GPA_RANGE_DECRYPTED;
+		vcpu->run->hypercall.args[2] |= huge
+			? KVM_MAP_GPA_RANGE_PAGE_SZ_2M
+			: KVM_MAP_GPA_RANGE_PAGE_SZ_4K;
+		vcpu->arch.complete_userspace_io = snp_complete_one_psc;
  
-	return 0; /* forward request to userspace */
+		return 0; /* forward request to userspace */
  
-out_resume:
-	svm->sev_es.psc_idx = 0;
-	svm->sev_es.psc_inflight = 0;
-	svm->sev_es.psc_2m = false;
-	ghcb_set_sw_exit_info_2(svm->sev_es.ghcb, psc_ret);
+	default:
+		/*
+		 * Only shared/private PSC operations are currently supported, so if the
+		 * entire range consists of unsupported operations (e.g. SMASH/UNSMASH),
+		 * then consider the entire range completed and avoid exiting to
+		 * userspace. In theory snp_complete_psc() can be called directly
+		 * at this point to complete the current range and start the next one,
+		 * but that could lead to unexpected levels of recursion.
+		 */
+		__snp_complete_one_psc(svm);
+		goto next_range;
+	}
  
-	return 1; /* resume guest */
+	unreachable();
  }
  
  static int __sev_snp_update_protected_guest_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists