linux-kernel - [PATCH] perf/x86/amd/uncore: Add flex array to struct amd_uncore

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID:
 <AS8PR02MB7237E4848B44A5226BD3551C8BE02@AS8PR02MB7237.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 11 May 2024 16:51:54 +0200
From: Erick Archer <erick.archer@...look.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
	Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
	"Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
	"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
	Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>
Cc: Erick Archer <erick.archer@...look.com>,
	x86@...nel.org,
	linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] perf/x86/amd/uncore: Add flex array to struct amd_uncore_ctx

This is an effort to get rid of all multiplications from allocation
functions in order to prevent integer overflows [1][2].

The "struct amd_uncore_ctx" can be refactored to use a flex array for
the "events" member. This way, the allocation/freeing of the memory can
be simplified.

Specifically, as the "curr" variable is a pointer to the amd_uncore_ctx
structure and it now ends up in a flexible array:

struct amd_uncore_ctx {
        [...]
        struct perf_event *events[];
};

the two-step allocation can be simplifief by using just one kzalloc_node
function and the struct_size() helper to do the arithmetic calculation
for the memory to be allocated.

This way, the code is more readable and safer.

Link: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#open-coded-arithmetic-in-allocator-arguments [1]
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/160 [2]
Suggested-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Signed-off-by: Erick Archer <erick.archer@...look.com>
---
Hi,

This patch can be considered v4 of this other one [1]. However, since
the patch has completely changed due to the addition of the flex array,
I have decided to make a new series and remove the "Reviewed-by:" tag
by Gustavo A. R. Silva and Kees cook.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-hardening/PAXPR02MB7248F46DEFA47E79677481B18B152@PAXPR02MB7248.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com/

Thanks,
Erick
---
 arch/x86/events/amd/uncore.c | 18 +++++-------------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/amd/uncore.c b/arch/x86/events/amd/uncore.c
index 4ccb8fa483e6..86755d16a3b2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/amd/uncore.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/amd/uncore.c
@@ -37,8 +37,8 @@ static int pmu_version;
 struct amd_uncore_ctx {
 	int refcnt;
 	int cpu;
-	struct perf_event **events;
 	struct hlist_node node;
+	struct perf_event *events[];
 };
 
 struct amd_uncore_pmu {
@@ -426,10 +426,8 @@ static void amd_uncore_ctx_free(struct amd_uncore *uncore, unsigned int cpu)
 		if (cpu == ctx->cpu)
 			cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, &pmu->active_mask);
 
-		if (!--ctx->refcnt) {
-			kfree(ctx->events);
+		if (!--ctx->refcnt)
 			kfree(ctx);
-		}
 
 		*per_cpu_ptr(pmu->ctx, cpu) = NULL;
 	}
@@ -474,19 +472,13 @@ static int amd_uncore_ctx_init(struct amd_uncore *uncore, unsigned int cpu)
 		/* Allocate context if sibling does not exist */
 		if (!curr) {
 			node = cpu_to_node(cpu);
-			curr = kzalloc_node(sizeof(*curr), GFP_KERNEL, node);
+			curr = kzalloc_node(struct_size(curr, events,
+							pmu->num_counters),
+					    GFP_KERNEL, node);
 			if (!curr)
 				goto fail;
 
 			curr->cpu = cpu;
-			curr->events = kzalloc_node(sizeof(*curr->events) *
-						    pmu->num_counters,
-						    GFP_KERNEL, node);
-			if (!curr->events) {
-				kfree(curr);
-				goto fail;
-			}
-
 			cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &pmu->active_mask);
 		}
 
-- 
2.25.1