[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zj-USRLJIGIvj7iE@x1>
Date: Sat, 11 May 2024 12:52:41 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Cc: Justin He <Justin.He@....com>, John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
James Clark <James.Clark@....com>,
"linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org" <linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
nd <nd@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf pmu: Fix num_events calculation
On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 05:50:29PM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
> On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 1:41 PM Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com> wrote:
> > As such the fix here is incomplete. There may be both sys json events
> > (detected by PMU/id name) and CPU json events (detected by CPUID). I'm
> > looking into a fix.
>
> Patch sent:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240511003601.2666907-1-irogers@google.com/
I applied the patch to tmp.perf-tools-next, will go to perf-tools-next
soon, would be good for Justin to test and provide a Tested-by.
- Arnaldo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists