[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <SA1PR11MB6734D9EF8C2D9A762CBEBF07A8E02@SA1PR11MB6734.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 11 May 2024 01:24:12 +0000
From: "Li, Xin3" <xin3.li@...el.com>
To: "Gao, Chao" <chao.gao@...el.com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-doc@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, "seanjc@...gle.com" <seanjc@...gle.com>,
"pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>, "corbet@....net"
<corbet@....net>, "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>, "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
"dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, "x86@...nel.org"
<x86@...nel.org>, "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>, "shuah@...nel.org"
<shuah@...nel.org>, "vkuznets@...hat.com" <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>, "Shankar, Ravi V"
<ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>, "xin@...or.com" <xin@...or.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 11/25] KVM: x86: Add kvm_is_fred_enabled()
> >+/*
> >+ * It's enough to check just CR4.FRED (X86_CR4_FRED) to tell if
> >+ * a vCPU is running with FRED enabled, because:
> >+ * 1) CR4.FRED can be set to 1 only _after_ IA32_EFER.LMA = 1.
> >+ * 2) To leave IA-32e mode, CR4.FRED must be cleared first.
> >+ *
> >+ * More details at FRED Spec 6.0 Section 4.2 Enabling in CR4.
> >+ */
>
> I think we can give more context here, e.g.,
>
> Although FRED architecture applies to 64-bit mode only, there is no need to check if
> the CPU is in 64-bit mode (i.e., IA32_EFER.LMA and CS.L) to tell if FRED is enabled
> because CR4.FRED=1 implies the CPU is in 64-bit mode.
What is "more context" here?
> Specifically,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists