[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zj7TKg9tHTwgWOIQ@LeoBras>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2024 23:08:42 -0300
From: Leonardo Bras <leobras@...hat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: Leonardo Bras <leobras@...hat.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@...cinc.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@...il.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
rcu@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/2] Avoid rcu_core() if CPU just left guest vcpu
On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 07:01:29AM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Wed, May 08, 2024, Leonardo Bras wrote:
> > Something just hit me, and maybe I need to propose something more generic.
>
> Yes. This is what I was trying to get across with my complaints about keying off
> of the last VM-Exit time. It's effectively a broad stroke "this task will likely
> be quiescent soon" and so the core concept/functionality belongs in common code,
> not KVM.
>
Hello Sean,
Paul implemented the RCU patience cmdline option, that will help avoiding
rcuc waking up if the grace period is younger than X miliseconds, which
means the last quiescent state needs to be at least X miliseconds old.
With that I just have to add a quiescent state in guest_exit(), and we will
be able to get the same effect of last_guest_exit patch.
I sent this RFC patch doing that:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240511020557.1198200-1-leobras@redhat.com/
Please take a look.
Thanks!
Leo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists