linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5] platform/x86: dell-laptop: Implement platform

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4d8de625-9018-4926-9519-37f5a90a96e5@gmx.de>
Date: Sun, 12 May 2024 19:53:28 +0200
From: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@....de>
To: "Shen, Yijun" <Yijun.Shen@...l.com>,
 "Limonciello, Mario" <mario.limonciello@....com>,
 Lyndon Sanche <lsanche@...deno.ca>
Cc: "pali@...nel.org" <pali@...nel.org>,
 "srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com" <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
 "ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com" <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>,
 "lkp@...el.com" <lkp@...el.com>, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
 Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
 Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
 Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...cle.com>,
 "platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org" <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
 "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 Dell Client Kernel <Dell.Client.Kernel@...l.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] platform/x86: dell-laptop: Implement platform_profile

Am 11.05.24 um 17:56 schrieb Shen, Yijun:

> Internal Use - Confidential
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Limonciello, Mario <mario.limonciello@....com>
>> Sent: Saturday, May 11, 2024 11:13 PM
>> To: Shen, Yijun <Yijun_Shen@...l.com>; Lyndon Sanche
>> <lsanche@...deno.ca>
>> Cc: pali@...nel.org; W_Armin@....de;
>> srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com; ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com;
>> lkp@...el.com; Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>; Matthew Garrett
>> <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>; Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>; Heiner Kallweit
>> <hkallweit1@...il.com>; Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...cle.com>;
>> platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Dell Client
>> Kernel <Dell.Client.Kernel@...l.com>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] platform/x86: dell-laptop: Implement platform_profile
>>
>>
>> [EXTERNAL EMAIL]
>>
>>
>>
>> On 5/11/2024 10:05 AM, Shen, Yijun wrote:
>>> Internal Use - Confidential
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, May 8, 2024 11:53 PM
>>>> To: Shen, Yijun <Yijun_Shen@...l.com>; Lyndon Sanche
>>>> <lsanche@...deno.ca>
>>>> Cc: pali@...nel.org; W_Armin@....de;
>>>> srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com; ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com;
>>>> lkp@...el.com; Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>; Matthew
>> Garrett
>>>> <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>; Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>; Heiner
>>>> Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>; Vegard Nossum
>>>> <vegard.nossum@...cle.com>; platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org;
>>>> linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Dell Client Kernel
>>>> <Dell.Client.Kernel@...l.com>
>>>> Subject: Re: RE: [PATCH v5] platform/x86: dell-laptop: Implement
>>>> platform_profile
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [EXTERNAL EMAIL]
>>>>
>>>> On 5/8/2024 09:24, Shen, Yijun wrote:
>>>>> Hi Lyndon,
>>>>>
>>>>>     Thanks for working on this patch.
>>>>>
>>>>>     Dell side has an initial testing with this patch on some laptops,
>>>>> it looks
>>>> good. While changing the platform profile:
>>>>> 1. The corresponding USTT option in BIOS will be changed.
>>>>> 2. thermald will not be impacted. The related PSVT and ITMT will be
>> loaded.
>>>>>     Some Dell DTs does not have the USTT, Dell'll have a check if
>>>>> nothing is
>>>> broken.
>>>>
>>>> Hi Alex!
>>>>
>>>> Have you had a check both on both your AMD laptops and workstations
>>>> too, or just the Intel ones?  I think it would be good to make sure
>>>> it's getting the correct experience in both cases.
>>>>
>>> Hi Mario,
>>>
>>>    I've a check for this, for both laptop and workstation, the dell_laptop
>> module will not be loaded. So, AMD platform will not be impacted by this
>> patch series.
>>> Follow is one example output with workstation.
>>>    #lsmod | grep dell
>>>      dell_wmi               28672  0
>>>      dell_smbios            32768  1 dell_wmi
>>>      dcdbas                 20480  1 dell_smbios
>>>      dell_wmi_descriptor    20480  2 dell_wmi,dell_smbios
>>>      sparse_keymap          12288  1 dell_wmi
>>>      ledtrig_audio          12288  3 snd_ctl_led,snd_hda_codec_generic,dell_wmi
>>>      video                  73728  2 dell_wmi,nvidia_modeset
>>>      wmi                    40960  5
>> video,dell_wmi,wmi_bmof,dell_smbios,dell_wmi_descriptor
>> Ah; right that makes sense.  In that case, is dell-laptop even the right place for
>> this patch series?  I would think the same policies for the platform profile
>> should be able to apply to desktop/workstation.
>>
>> The v6 of this series would block smbios-thermal-ctl from working on a
>> workstation too.
>>
>>>>>      Additional, with this patch, follow behavior is found:
>>>>>     1. For example, the platform profile is quiet.
>>>>>     2. Reboot the system and change the USTT to performance.
>>>>>     3. Boot to desktop, the platform profile is "quiet", the USTT
>>>>> will be
>>>> changed back to "quiet".
>>>>>     This looks like not a proper user experience. The platform
>>>>> profile should
>>>> honor the BIOS setting, aka, the platform profile should be switched
>>>> to "performance".
>>>> I agree, this sounds like the initial profile needs to be read from
>>>> the BIOS settings too.
>>>>
>>>> Furthermore I wanted to ask is there also a WMI setting that
>>>> corresponds to this that dell-wmi-sysman offers?
>>>    Yes, Mario, you're right. This thermal setting could also be toggled by dell-
>> wmi-sysman.
>>> But, for the Dell consumer AMD laptops, like Alienware, the BIOS is another
>> variant which is different with the workstation one.
>>> With this variant BIOS, there is no USTT and also no dell_wmi/dell-wmi-
>> sysman.
>>>> I'm wondering if both should be probed in case the SMBIOS one goes
>> away one day.
>>>    Yep, I think this is a good suggestion.
>>>
>> Great! Although something I wonder is if the policy when changed with dell-
>> wmi-sysman is immediate or requires a reboot.  A lot of the settings in there
>> aren't effective until after a reboot.
>>
>> If this is one of them then it might not be a good idea to make it work for
>> both.
> Hi Mario,
>
>   Just have a check, the check steps are:
> 1. stop the thermald
> 2. run the stress test
> 3. Toggle the thermal setting between UltraPerformance and Quiet via dell-wmi-sysman
> 4. Check the CPU FAN speed
>   The system reboot is not needed, the CPU fan speed changes immediately.
>   A screen recorder here: https://dell.box.com/s/p2bhd2b6cv8z5buk9eao3bosgrrp1lf9
>
> Thanks
>
Hi,

i believe it should be the responsibility of the manufacturer (in this case Dell) that
the thermal state remains consistent across both interfaces.

I think that the official Windows utility only checks the thermal state reported by
the USTT interface, so we should match this behavior.

Thanks,
Armin Wolf