linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 07/17] KVM: x86/mmu: Use synthetic page fault error code to indicate private faults

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a7def4e2-34f0-45cf-8efa-eb063c85591f@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 13:56:33 +0800
From: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@...el.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/17] KVM: x86/mmu: Use synthetic page fault error code
 to indicate private faults

On 5/7/2024 11:58 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
> 
> Add and use a synthetic, KVM-defined page fault error code to indicate
> whether a fault is to private vs. shared memory.  TDX and SNP have
> different mechanisms for reporting private vs. shared, and KVM's
> software-protected VMs have no mechanism at all.  Usurp an error code
> flag to avoid having to plumb another parameter to kvm_mmu_page_fault()
> and friends.
> 
> Alternatively, KVM could borrow AMD's PFERR_GUEST_ENC_MASK, i.e. set it
> for TDX and software-protected VMs as appropriate, but that would require
> *clearing* the flag for SEV and SEV-ES VMs, which support encrypted
> memory at the hardware layer, but don't utilize private memory at the
> KVM layer.
> 
> Opportunistically add a comment to call out that the logic for software-
> protected VMs is (and was before this commit) broken for nested MMUs, i.e.
> for nested TDP, as the GPA is an L2 GPA.  Punt on trying to play nice with
> nested MMUs as there is a _lot_ of functionality that simply doesn't work
> for software-protected VMs, e.g. all of the paths where KVM accesses guest
> memory need to be updated to be aware of private vs. shared memory.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
> Message-Id: <20240228024147.41573-6-seanjc@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>

Reviewed-by: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@...el.com>

> ---
>   arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h |  7 ++++++-
>   arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c          | 14 ++++++++++++++
>   arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h |  2 +-
>   3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 12e727301262..0dc755a6dc0c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -273,7 +273,12 @@ enum x86_intercept_stage;
>    * when emulating instructions that triggers implicit access.
>    */
>   #define PFERR_IMPLICIT_ACCESS	BIT_ULL(48)
> -#define PFERR_SYNTHETIC_MASK	(PFERR_IMPLICIT_ACCESS)
> +/*
> + * PRIVATE_ACCESS is a KVM-defined flag us to indicate that a fault occurred
> + * when the guest was accessing private memory.
> + */
> +#define PFERR_PRIVATE_ACCESS   BIT_ULL(49)
> +#define PFERR_SYNTHETIC_MASK   (PFERR_IMPLICIT_ACCESS | PFERR_PRIVATE_ACCESS)
>   
>   #define PFERR_NESTED_GUEST_PAGE (PFERR_GUEST_PAGE_MASK |	\
>   				 PFERR_WRITE_MASK |		\
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> index 3609167ba30e..eb041acec2dc 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> @@ -5799,6 +5799,20 @@ int noinline kvm_mmu_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t cr2_or_gpa, u64 err
>   	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!VALID_PAGE(vcpu->arch.mmu->root.hpa)))
>   		return RET_PF_RETRY;
>   
> +	/*
> +	 * Except for reserved faults (emulated MMIO is shared-only), set the
> +	 * PFERR_PRIVATE_ACCESS flag for software-protected VMs based on the gfn's
> +	 * current attributes, which are the source of truth for such VMs.  Note,
> +	 * this wrong for nested MMUs as the GPA is an L2 GPA, but KVM doesn't
> +	 * currently supported nested virtualization (among many other things)
> +	 * for software-protected VMs.
> +	 */
> +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KVM_SW_PROTECTED_VM) &&
> +	    !(error_code & PFERR_RSVD_MASK) &&
> +	    vcpu->kvm->arch.vm_type == KVM_X86_SW_PROTECTED_VM &&
> +	    kvm_mem_is_private(vcpu->kvm, gpa_to_gfn(cr2_or_gpa)))
> +		error_code |= PFERR_PRIVATE_ACCESS;
> +
>   	r = RET_PF_INVALID;
>   	if (unlikely(error_code & PFERR_RSVD_MASK)) {
>   		r = handle_mmio_page_fault(vcpu, cr2_or_gpa, direct);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h
> index 797b80f996a7..dfd9ff383663 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h
> @@ -306,7 +306,7 @@ static inline int kvm_mmu_do_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t cr2_or_gpa,
>   		.max_level = KVM_MAX_HUGEPAGE_LEVEL,
>   		.req_level = PG_LEVEL_4K,
>   		.goal_level = PG_LEVEL_4K,
> -		.is_private = kvm_mem_is_private(vcpu->kvm, cr2_or_gpa >> PAGE_SHIFT),
> +		.is_private = err & PFERR_PRIVATE_ACCESS,
>   	};
>   	int r;
>