linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH docs-next v2] docs: handling-regressions.rst: recommend using "Closes:" tags

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7bc5065a-030d-48ea-9cf5-1aad52a72145@leemhuis.info>
Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 08:49:26 +0200
From: Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@...mhuis.info>
To: Karel Balej <balejk@...fyz.cz>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
 regressions@...ts.linux.dev, workflows@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH docs-next v2] docs: handling-regressions.rst: recommend
 using "Closes:" tags

On 12.05.24 10:48, Karel Balej wrote:
> Thorsten Leemhuis, 2024-05-12T09:47:31+02:00:
>> On 10.05.24 20:34, Karel Balej wrote:

>> Not totally sure if...
>>
>>> Some maintainers may even
>>> +   prefer it over "Closes:" entirely, although the latter is generally
>>> +   recommended.
>>
>> ...this sentence really should be here, but whatever.
> 
> I think I can see your point. I added it as it was something you
> mentioned before but looking now at that mail again, I think this is not
> really what you said. So I'm in favour of dropping it.
> 
> If you give me a go-ahead, I will send v3 with this sentence dropped and
> your Ack added right back.

Yeah, do that please. Thx again! Ciao, Thorsten