[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id:
<171555842976.18024.13752863594876761911.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 00:00:29 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@...nel.org>
Cc: ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org,
martin.lau@...ux.dev, eddyz87@...il.com, song@...nel.org,
yonghong.song@...ux.dev, john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org,
sdf@...gle.com, haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org, bjorn@...nel.org,
pulehui@...wei.com, paulmck@...nel.org, paul.walmsley@...ive.com,
palmer@...belt.com, aou@...s.berkeley.edu, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
puranjay12@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf] riscv, bpf: make some atomic operations fully ordered
Hello:
This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>:
On Sun, 5 May 2024 20:16:33 +0000 you wrote:
> The BPF atomic operations with the BPF_FETCH modifier along with
> BPF_XCHG and BPF_CMPXCHG are fully ordered but the RISC-V JIT implements
> all atomic operations except BPF_CMPXCHG with relaxed ordering.
>
> Section 8.1 of the "The RISC-V Instruction Set Manual Volume I:
> Unprivileged ISA" [1], titled, "Specifying Ordering of Atomic
> Instructions" says:
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [bpf] riscv, bpf: make some atomic operations fully ordered
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/20a759df3bba
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists