linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/9] dt-bindings: clk: qcom,dispcc-sm8x50: describe additional DP clocks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 11:08:22 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
 Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
 Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
 Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@...rphone.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/9] dt-bindings: clk: qcom,dispcc-sm8x50: describe
 additional DP clocks

On 12/05/2024 00:04, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> +    minItems: 7
>      items:
>        - const: bi_tcxo
>        - const: dsi0_phy_pll_out_byteclk
> @@ -45,6 +53,12 @@ properties:
>        - const: dsi1_phy_pll_out_dsiclk
>        - const: dp_phy_pll_link_clk
>        - const: dp_phy_pll_vco_div_clk
> +      - const: edp_phy_pll_link_clk
> +      - const: edp_phy_pll_vco_div_clk
> +      - const: dptx1_phy_pll_link_clk
> +      - const: dptx1_phy_pll_vco_div_clk
> +      - const: dptx2_phy_pll_link_clk
> +      - const: dptx2_phy_pll_vco_div_clk
>  
>    '#clock-cells':
>      const: 1
> @@ -68,6 +82,20 @@ properties:
>        A phandle to an OPP node describing required MMCX performance point.
>      maxItems: 1
>  
> +allOf:

This goes after required: block (like in example-schema). With this fixed:

Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>

Best regards,
Krzysztof