[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZkHbKGAuBPN3KOVW@pengutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 11:19:36 +0200
From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] mtd: nand: mxc_nand: support software ECC
On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 09:42:17AM +0200, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Hi Sascha,
>
> s.hauer@...gutronix.de wrote on Wed, 08 May 2024 13:08:29 +0200:
>
> > With these changes the driver can be used with software BCH ECC which
> > is useful for NAND chips that require a stronger ECC than the i.MX
> > hardware supports.
> >
> > The controller normally interleaves user data with OOB data when
> > accessing the NAND chip. With Software BCH ECC we write the data
> > to the NAND in a way that the raw data on the NAND chip matches the
> > way the NAND layer sees it. This way commands like NAND_CMD_RNDOUT
> > work as expected.
> >
> > This was tested on i.MX27 but should work on the other SoCs supported
> > by this driver as well.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
> > ---
> > drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mxc_nand.c | 84 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> > 1 file changed, 75 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mxc_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mxc_nand.c
> > index 1e8b4553e03ba..7004fd57c80f7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mxc_nand.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mxc_nand.c
> > @@ -178,6 +178,7 @@ struct mxc_nand_host {
> > int used_oobsize;
> > int active_cs;
> > unsigned int ecc_stats_v1;
> > + unsigned int column;
> >
> > struct completion op_completion;
> >
> > @@ -1397,10 +1398,10 @@ static int mxcnd_attach_chip(struct nand_chip *chip)
> > chip->ecc.bytes = host->devtype_data->eccbytes;
> > host->eccsize = host->devtype_data->eccsize;
> > chip->ecc.size = 512;
> > - mtd_set_ooblayout(mtd, host->devtype_data->ooblayout);
> >
> > switch (chip->ecc.engine_type) {
> > case NAND_ECC_ENGINE_TYPE_ON_HOST:
> > + mtd_set_ooblayout(mtd, host->devtype_data->ooblayout);
> > chip->ecc.read_page = mxc_nand_read_page;
> > chip->ecc.read_page_raw = mxc_nand_read_page_raw;
> > chip->ecc.read_oob = mxc_nand_read_oob;
> > @@ -1465,6 +1466,54 @@ static int mxcnd_setup_interface(struct nand_chip *chip, int chipnr,
> > return host->devtype_data->setup_interface(chip, chipnr, conf);
> > }
> >
> > +static void copy_page_to_sram(struct mtd_info *mtd)
> > +{
> > + struct nand_chip *this = mtd_to_nand(mtd);
> > + struct mxc_nand_host *host = nand_get_controller_data(this);
> > + void *buf = host->data_buf;
> > + unsigned int n_subpages = mtd->writesize / 512;
> > + int oob_per_subpage, i;
> > +
> > + /* mtd->writesize is not set during ident scanning */
> > + if (!n_subpages)
> > + n_subpages = 1;
> > +
> > + oob_per_subpage = (mtd->oobsize / n_subpages) & ~1;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < n_subpages; i++) {
> > + memcpy16_toio(host->main_area0 + i * 512, buf, 512);
> > + buf += 512;
> > +
> > + memcpy16_toio(host->spare0 + i * host->devtype_data->spare_len, buf,
> > + oob_per_subpage);
> > + buf += oob_per_subpage;
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void copy_page_from_sram(struct mtd_info *mtd)
> > +{
> > + struct nand_chip *this = mtd_to_nand(mtd);
> > + struct mxc_nand_host *host = nand_get_controller_data(this);
> > + void *buf = host->data_buf;
> > + unsigned int n_subpages = mtd->writesize / 512;
> > + int oob_per_subpage, i;
> > +
> > + /* mtd->writesize is not set during ident scanning */
> > + if (!n_subpages)
> > + n_subpages = 1;
> > +
> > + oob_per_subpage = (mtd->oobsize / n_subpages) & ~1;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < n_subpages; i++) {
> > + memcpy16_fromio(buf, host->main_area0 + i * 512, 512);
> > + buf += 512;
> > +
> > + memcpy16_fromio(buf, host->spare0 + i * host->devtype_data->spare_len,
> > + oob_per_subpage);
> > + buf += oob_per_subpage;
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > static int mxcnd_exec_op(struct nand_chip *chip,
> > const struct nand_operation *op,
> > bool check_only)
> > @@ -1496,8 +1545,11 @@ static int mxcnd_exec_op(struct nand_chip *chip,
> > */
> > break;
> > case NAND_OP_CMD_INSTR:
> > - if (instr->ctx.cmd.opcode == NAND_CMD_PAGEPROG)
> > + if (instr->ctx.cmd.opcode == NAND_CMD_PAGEPROG) {
> > + if (chip->ecc.engine_type != NAND_ECC_ENGINE_TYPE_ON_HOST)
> > + copy_page_to_sram(mtd);
> > host->devtype_data->send_page(mtd, NFC_INPUT);
> > + }
>
> Same as before: data moves should not happen here.
>
> >
> > host->devtype_data->send_cmd(host, instr->ctx.cmd.opcode, true);
> >
> > @@ -1506,6 +1558,8 @@ static int mxcnd_exec_op(struct nand_chip *chip,
> > if (instr->ctx.cmd.opcode == NAND_CMD_STATUS)
> > statusreq = true;
> >
> > + host->column = 0;
> > +
>
> This is risky but maybe this is the trick to get NAND_CMD_RNDOUT
> working? If yes maybe it is worth separating from this patchset, if
> possible, with a comment explaining what this is all about (the
> controller's SRAM being some kind of 1:1 mapping with the NAND SRAM,
> thus we need to write the data at the correct offset in the controller
> SRAM, I guess?).
I don't think it's possible to separate introducing the host->column
variable to a separate patch, because this variable is only used with
NAND_ECC_ENGINE_TYPE_SOFT and on the other hand NAND_ECC_ENGINE_TYPE_SOFT
only works with this variable.
Anyway, adding a description what this is all about is a good idea and
I'll do this. In fact I already tried to add one when I found out that
it's really hard to put it into words, so I sent without it ;)
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Powered by blists - more mailing lists