[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<DU0PR04MB94176F2354DC55FF505305E688E22@DU0PR04MB9417.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 12:39:42 +0000
From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
To: Rasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@...vas.dk>, "Peng Fan (OSS)"
<peng.fan@....nxp.com>, Abel Vesa <abelvesa@...nel.org>, Michael Turquette
<mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Shawn Guo
<shawnguo@...nel.org>, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>, Pengutronix
Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>, Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
Jacky Bai <ping.bai@....com>, Ye Li <ye.li@....com>, Aisheng Dong
<aisheng.dong@....com>
CC: "linux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
"imx@...ts.linux.dev" <imx@...ts.linux.dev>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>, "S.J. Wang"
<shengjiu.wang@....com>, Chancel Liu <chancel.liu@....com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 05/17] clk: imx: pll14xx: Add constraint for fvco
frequency
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/17] clk: imx: pll14xx: Add constraint for fvco
> frequency
>
> On 10/05/2024 11.19, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> > From: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@....com>
> >
> > The fvco frequency range is between 1600MHz and 3200MHz, without this
> > constraint the fvco may out of range, the real output frequency is no
> > accurate.
>
> Could you please point everybody in the direction of where that requirement
> is stated?
VCO has a range, we need update reference manual.
Regards,
Peng.
The imx8mp reference manual, for example, merely lists constraints
> for p, m, s and k.
>
>
> >
> > /* First try if we can get the desired rate from one of the static
> > entries */ @@ -193,6 +195,10 @@ static void
> imx_pll14xx_calc_settings(struct clk_pll14xx *pll, unsigned long rat
> > kdiv = pll1443x_calc_kdiv(mdiv, pdiv, sdiv, rate,
> prate);
> > fout = pll14xx_calc_rate(pll, mdiv, pdiv, sdiv, kdiv,
> prate);
> >
> > + fvco = fout << sdiv;
> > +
> > + if (fvco < 1600000000 || fvco > 3200000000)
> > + continue;
>
> If this is really a necessary constraint, it seems that one could just up-front
> compute the only possible value of s, or at least change the logic so that one
> loops over a smaller range of possible values of s.
>
> Rasmus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists