[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240512111453.gwuw34voa57uccct@quack3>
Date: Sun, 12 May 2024 13:14:53 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...weicloud.com>
Cc: tytso@....edu, jack@...e.com, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] jbd2: use bh_in instead of jh2bh(jh_in) to simplify
code
On Mon 06-05-24 22:17:58, Kemeng Shi wrote:
> We save jh2bh(jh_in) to bh_in, so use bh_in directly instead of
> jh2bh(jh_in) to simplify the code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...weicloud.com>
Looks good. Feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Honza
> ---
> fs/jbd2/journal.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/jbd2/journal.c b/fs/jbd2/journal.c
> index 87f558bd2e8a..01e33b643e4d 100644
> --- a/fs/jbd2/journal.c
> +++ b/fs/jbd2/journal.c
> @@ -363,8 +363,8 @@ int jbd2_journal_write_metadata_buffer(transaction_t *transaction,
> new_folio = virt_to_folio(jh_in->b_frozen_data);
> new_offset = offset_in_folio(new_folio, jh_in->b_frozen_data);
> } else {
> - new_folio = jh2bh(jh_in)->b_folio;
> - new_offset = offset_in_folio(new_folio, jh2bh(jh_in)->b_data);
> + new_folio = bh_in->b_folio;
> + new_offset = offset_in_folio(new_folio, bh_in->b_data);
> }
>
> mapped_data = kmap_local_folio(new_folio, new_offset);
> --
> 2.30.0
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists