| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20240513160331.GA320190@cmpxchg.org> Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 12:03:31 -0400 From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org> To: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>, Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>, "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>, David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@...gle.com>, Chun-Tse Shao <ctshao@...gle.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 00/10] mm: page_alloc: freelist migratetype hygiene On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 11:14:43PM -0600, Yu Zhao wrote: > On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 12:04 PM Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org> wrote: > > > > V4: > > - fixed !pcp_order_allowed() case in free_unref_folios() > > - reworded the patch 0 changelog a bit for the git log > > - rebased to mm-everything-2024-03-19-23-01 > > - runtime-tested again with various CONFIG_DEBUG_FOOs enabled > > > > --- > > > > The page allocator's mobility grouping is intended to keep unmovable > > pages separate from reclaimable/compactable ones to allow on-demand > > defragmentation for higher-order allocations and huge pages. > > > > Currently, there are several places where accidental type mixing > > occurs: an allocation asks for a page of a certain migratetype and > > receives another. This ruins pageblocks for compaction, which in turn > > makes allocating huge pages more expensive and less reliable. > > > > The series addresses those causes. The last patch adds type checks on > > all freelist movements to prevent new violations being introduced. > > > > The benefits can be seen in a mixed workload that stresses the machine > > with a memcache-type workload and a kernel build job while > > periodically attempting to allocate batches of THP. The following data > > is aggregated over 50 consecutive defconfig builds: > > > > VANILLA PATCHED > > Hugealloc Time mean 165843.93 ( +0.00%) 113025.88 ( -31.85%) > > Hugealloc Time stddev 158957.35 ( +0.00%) 114716.07 ( -27.83%) > > Kbuild Real time 310.24 ( +0.00%) 300.73 ( -3.06%) > > Kbuild User time 1271.13 ( +0.00%) 1259.42 ( -0.92%) > > Kbuild System time 582.02 ( +0.00%) 559.79 ( -3.81%) > > THP fault alloc 30585.14 ( +0.00%) 40853.62 ( +33.57%) > > THP fault fallback 36626.46 ( +0.00%) 26357.62 ( -28.04%) > > THP fault fail rate % 54.49 ( +0.00%) 39.22 ( -27.53%) > > Pagealloc fallback 1328.00 ( +0.00%) 1.00 ( -99.85%) > > Pagealloc type mismatch 181009.50 ( +0.00%) 0.00 ( -100.00%) > > Direct compact stall 434.56 ( +0.00%) 257.66 ( -40.61%) > > Direct compact fail 421.70 ( +0.00%) 249.94 ( -40.63%) > > Direct compact success 12.86 ( +0.00%) 7.72 ( -37.09%) > > Direct compact success rate % 2.86 ( +0.00%) 2.82 ( -0.96%) > > Compact daemon scanned migrate 3370059.62 ( +0.00%) 3612054.76 ( +7.18%) > > Compact daemon scanned free 7718439.20 ( +0.00%) 5386385.02 ( -30.21%) > > Compact direct scanned migrate 309248.62 ( +0.00%) 176721.04 ( -42.85%) > > Compact direct scanned free 433582.84 ( +0.00%) 315727.66 ( -27.18%) > > Compact migrate scanned daemon % 91.20 ( +0.00%) 94.48 ( +3.56%) > > Compact free scanned daemon % 94.58 ( +0.00%) 94.42 ( -0.16%) > > Compact total migrate scanned 3679308.24 ( +0.00%) 3788775.80 ( +2.98%) > > Compact total free scanned 8152022.04 ( +0.00%) 5702112.68 ( -30.05%) > > Alloc stall 872.04 ( +0.00%) 5156.12 ( +490.71%) > > Pages kswapd scanned 510645.86 ( +0.00%) 3394.94 ( -99.33%) > > Pages kswapd reclaimed 134811.62 ( +0.00%) 2701.26 ( -98.00%) > > Pages direct scanned 99546.06 ( +0.00%) 376407.52 ( +278.12%) > > Pages direct reclaimed 62123.40 ( +0.00%) 289535.70 ( +366.06%) > > Pages total scanned 610191.92 ( +0.00%) 379802.46 ( -37.76%) > > Pages scanned kswapd % 76.36 ( +0.00%) 0.10 ( -98.58%) > > Swap out 12057.54 ( +0.00%) 15022.98 ( +24.59%) > > Swap in 209.16 ( +0.00%) 256.48 ( +22.52%) > > File refaults 17701.64 ( +0.00%) 11765.40 ( -33.53%) > > > > Huge page success rate is higher, allocation latencies are shorter and > > more predictable. > > > > Stealing (fallback) rate is drastically reduced. Notably, while the > > vanilla kernel keeps doing fallbacks on an ongoing basis, the patched > > kernel enters a steady state once the distribution of block types is > > adequate for the workload. Steals over 50 runs: > > > > VANILLA PATCHED > > 1504.0 227.0 > > 1557.0 6.0 > > 1391.0 13.0 > > 1080.0 26.0 > > 1057.0 40.0 > > 1156.0 6.0 > > 805.0 46.0 > > 736.0 20.0 > > 1747.0 2.0 > > 1699.0 34.0 > > 1269.0 13.0 > > 1858.0 12.0 > > 907.0 4.0 > > 727.0 2.0 > > 563.0 2.0 > > 3094.0 2.0 > > 10211.0 3.0 > > 2621.0 1.0 > > 5508.0 2.0 > > 1060.0 2.0 > > 538.0 3.0 > > 5773.0 2.0 > > 2199.0 0.0 > > 3781.0 2.0 > > 1387.0 1.0 > > 4977.0 0.0 > > 2865.0 1.0 > > 1814.0 1.0 > > 3739.0 1.0 > > 6857.0 0.0 > > 382.0 0.0 > > 407.0 1.0 > > 3784.0 0.0 > > 297.0 0.0 > > 298.0 0.0 > > 6636.0 0.0 > > 4188.0 0.0 > > 242.0 0.0 > > 9960.0 0.0 > > 5816.0 0.0 > > 354.0 0.0 > > 287.0 0.0 > > 261.0 0.0 > > 140.0 1.0 > > 2065.0 0.0 > > 312.0 0.0 > > 331.0 0.0 > > 164.0 0.0 > > 465.0 1.0 > > 219.0 0.0 > > > > Type mismatches are down too. Those count every time an allocation > > request asks for one migratetype and gets another. This can still > > occur minimally in the patched kernel due to non-stealing fallbacks, > > but it's quite rare and follows the pattern of overall fallbacks - > > once the block type distribution settles, mismatches cease as well: > > > > VANILLA: PATCHED: > > 182602.0 268.0 > > 135794.0 20.0 > > 88619.0 19.0 > > 95973.0 0.0 > > 129590.0 0.0 > > 129298.0 0.0 > > 147134.0 0.0 > > 230854.0 0.0 > > 239709.0 0.0 > > 137670.0 0.0 > > 132430.0 0.0 > > 65712.0 0.0 > > 57901.0 0.0 > > 67506.0 0.0 > > 63565.0 4.0 > > 34806.0 0.0 > > 42962.0 0.0 > > 32406.0 0.0 > > 38668.0 0.0 > > 61356.0 0.0 > > 57800.0 0.0 > > 41435.0 0.0 > > 83456.0 0.0 > > 65048.0 0.0 > > 28955.0 0.0 > > 47597.0 0.0 > > 75117.0 0.0 > > 55564.0 0.0 > > 38280.0 0.0 > > 52404.0 0.0 > > 26264.0 0.0 > > 37538.0 0.0 > > 19671.0 0.0 > > 30936.0 0.0 > > 26933.0 0.0 > > 16962.0 0.0 > > 44554.0 0.0 > > 46352.0 0.0 > > 24995.0 0.0 > > 35152.0 0.0 > > 12823.0 0.0 > > 21583.0 0.0 > > 18129.0 0.0 > > 31693.0 0.0 > > 28745.0 0.0 > > 33308.0 0.0 > > 31114.0 0.0 > > 35034.0 0.0 > > 12111.0 0.0 > > 24885.0 0.0 > > > > Compaction work is markedly reduced despite much better THP rates. > > > > In the vanilla kernel, reclaim seems to have been driven primarily by > > watermark boosting that happens as a result of fallbacks. With those > > all but eliminated, watermarks average lower and kswapd does less > > work. The uptick in direct reclaim is because THP requests have to > > fend for themselves more often - which is intended policy right > > now. Aggregate reclaim activity is lowered significantly, though. > > This series significantly regresses Android and ChromeOS under memory > pressure. THPs are virtually nonexistent on client devices, and IIRC, > it was mentioned in the early discussions that potential regressions > for such a case are somewhat expected? This is not expected for the 10 patches here. You might be referring to the discussion around the huge page allocator series, which had fallback restrictions and many changes to reclaim and compaction. Can you confirm that you were testing the latest patches that are in mm-stable as of today? There was a series of follow-up fixes. Especially, please double check you have the follow-up fixes to compaction capturing and the CMA fallback policy. It sounds like the behavior Baolin described before the CMA fix. Lastly, what's the base you backported this series to? > On Android (ARMv8.2), app launch time regressed by about 7%; On > ChromeOS (Intel ADL), tab switch time regressed by about 8%. Also PSI > (full and some) on both platforms increased by over 20%. I could post > the details of the benchmarks and the metrics they measure, but I > doubt they would mean much to you. I did ask our test teams to save > extra kernel logs that might be more helpful, and I could forward them > to you. If the issue persists with the latest patches in -mm, a kernel config and snapshots of /proc/vmstat, /proc/pagetypeinfo, /proc/zoneinfo before/during/after the problematic behavior would be very helpful.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists