[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240513162942.68484-1-richard.genoud@bootlin.com>
Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 18:29:42 +0200
From: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@...tlin.com>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
Cc: Esteban Blanc <eblanc@...libre.com>,
linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org,
Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@...tlin.com>
Subject: [PATCH] rtc: tps6594: Add power management support
Add power management support to the driver. This allows a SoC to wake
from suspend using the nINT provided by the RTC.
It takes care of the case when the interrupt has not been caught because
the kernel has not yet woke up.
(This is the case when only edges interrupt are caught)
Signed-off-by: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@...tlin.com>
---
drivers/rtc/rtc-tps6594.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/mfd/tps6594.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 47 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-tps6594.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-tps6594.c
index 838ae8562a35..b769d120c624 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-tps6594.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-tps6594.c
@@ -415,6 +415,8 @@ static int tps6594_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (irq < 0)
return dev_err_probe(dev, irq, "Failed to get irq\n");
+ tps->irq_rtc = irq;
+
ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, irq, NULL, tps6594_rtc_interrupt,
IRQF_ONESHOT, TPS6594_IRQ_NAME_ALARM,
dev);
@@ -434,6 +436,49 @@ static int tps6594_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return devm_rtc_register_device(rtc);
}
+static int tps6594_rtc_resume(struct device *dev)
+{
+ struct tps6594 *tps = dev_get_drvdata(dev->parent);
+ struct rtc_device *rtc_dev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = regmap_test_bits(tps->regmap, TPS6594_REG_INT_STARTUP,
+ TPS6594_BIT_RTC_INT);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ dev_err(dev, "failed to read REG_INT_STARTUP: %d\n", ret);
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ if (ret > 0) {
+ /*
+ * If the alarm bit is set, it means that the IRQ has been
+ * fired. But, the kernel may not have woke up yet when it
+ * happened. So, we have to clear it.
+ */
+ ret = regmap_write(tps->regmap, TPS6594_REG_RTC_STATUS,
+ TPS6594_BIT_ALARM);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ dev_err(dev, "error clearing alarm bit: %d", ret);
+
+ rtc_update_irq(rtc_dev, 1, RTC_IRQF | RTC_AF);
+ }
+out:
+ disable_irq_wake(tps->irq_rtc);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int tps6594_rtc_suspend(struct device *dev)
+{
+ struct tps6594 *tps = dev_get_drvdata(dev->parent);
+
+ enable_irq_wake(tps->irq_rtc);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(tps6594_rtc_pm_ops, tps6594_rtc_suspend, tps6594_rtc_resume);
+
static const struct platform_device_id tps6594_rtc_id_table[] = {
{ "tps6594-rtc", },
{}
@@ -444,6 +489,7 @@ static struct platform_driver tps6594_rtc_driver = {
.probe = tps6594_rtc_probe,
.driver = {
.name = "tps6594-rtc",
+ .pm = pm_sleep_ptr(&tps6594_rtc_pm_ops),
},
.id_table = tps6594_rtc_id_table,
};
diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/tps6594.h b/include/linux/mfd/tps6594.h
index 3f7c5e23cd4c..85933f1519c4 100644
--- a/include/linux/mfd/tps6594.h
+++ b/include/linux/mfd/tps6594.h
@@ -1011,6 +1011,7 @@ struct tps6594 {
bool use_crc;
struct regmap *regmap;
int irq;
+ int irq_rtc;
struct regmap_irq_chip_data *irq_data;
};
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists