lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 10:33:28 -0700
From: Joe Damato <jdamato@...tly.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, zyjzyj2000@...il.com, nalramli@...tly.com,
	Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
	Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
	"open list:MELLANOX MLX5 core VPI driver" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/1] net/mlx5e: Add per queue netdev-genl
 stats

On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 07:58:27AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri, 10 May 2024 04:17:04 +0000 Joe Damato wrote:
> > Add functions to support the netdev-genl per queue stats API.
> > 
> > ./cli.py --spec netlink/specs/netdev.yaml \
> > --dump qstats-get --json '{"scope": "queue"}'
> > 
> > ...snip
> > 
> >  {'ifindex': 7,
> >   'queue-id': 62,
> >   'queue-type': 'rx',
> >   'rx-alloc-fail': 0,
> >   'rx-bytes': 105965251,
> >   'rx-packets': 179790},
> >  {'ifindex': 7,
> >   'queue-id': 0,
> >   'queue-type': 'tx',
> >   'tx-bytes': 9402665,
> >   'tx-packets': 17551},
> > 
> > ...snip
> > 
> > Also tested with the script tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/stats.py
> > in several scenarios to ensure stats tallying was correct:
> > 
> > - on boot (default queue counts)
> > - adjusting queue count up or down (ethtool -L eth0 combined ...)
> > - adding mqprio TCs
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Joe Damato <jdamato@...tly.com>
> 
> Tariq, could you take a look? Is it good enough to make 6.10? 
> Would be great to have it..

Thanks Jakub.

FYI: I've also sent a v5 of the mlx4 patches which is only a very minor
change from the v4 as suggested by Tariq (see the changelog in that cover
letter).

I am not trying to "rush" either in, to to speak, but if they both made it
to 6.10 it would be great to have the same support on both drivers in the
same kernel release :)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ