linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFCv1 12/14] iommufd: Add IOMMUFD_OBJ_VQUEUE and IOMMUFD_CMD_VQUEUE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZkGZ7+37HnLlT6Jn@nvidia.com>
Date: Sun, 12 May 2024 21:41:19 -0700
From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
CC: <will@...nel.org>, <robin.murphy@....com>, <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
	<suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>, <joro@...tes.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
	<yi.l.liu@...el.com>, <eric.auger@...hat.com>, <vasant.hegde@....com>,
	<jon.grimm@....com>, <santosh.shukla@....com>, <Dhaval.Giani@....com>,
	<shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFCv1 12/14] iommufd: Add IOMMUFD_OBJ_VQUEUE and
 IOMMUFD_CMD_VQUEUE_ALLOC

On Sun, May 12, 2024 at 12:02:21PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 08:47:09PM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> 
> > +/**
> > + * struct iommu_vqueue_alloc - ioctl(IOMMU_VQUEUE_ALLOC)
> > + * @size: sizeof(struct iommu_vqueue_alloc)
> > + * @flags: Must be 0
> > + * @viommu_id: viommu ID to associate the virtual queue with
> > + * @out_vqueue_id: The ID of the new virtual queue
> > + * @data_type: One of enum iommu_vqueue_data_type
> > + * @data_len: Length of the type specific data
> > + * @data_uptr: User pointer to the type specific data
> > + *
> > + * Allocate an virtual queue object for driver-specific HW-accelerated queue
> > + */
> > +
> > +struct iommu_vqueue_alloc {
> > +	__u32 size;
> > +	__u32 flags;
> > +	__u32 viommu_id;
> > +	__u32 out_vqueue_id;
> > +	__u32 data_type;
> > +	__u32 data_len;
> > +	__aligned_u64 data_uptr;
> 
> Some of the iommus will want an IPA here not a user pointer. I think
> it is fine API wise, we'd just add a flag to indicate data_uptr is an
> IPA.

Ack.

Nicolin