linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] tpm: add some algorithm and constant definitions from the TPM spec

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <D19QIQS6SU8W.27A70AXVLRD12@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 01:52:45 +0300
From: "Jarkko Sakkinen" <jarkko@...nel.org>
To: "Jarkko Sakkinen" <jarkko@...nel.org>, "Ignat Korchagin"
 <ignat@...udflare.com>, "James Bottomley"
 <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>, "Mimi Zohar"
 <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>, "David Howells" <dhowells@...hat.com>, "Paul Moore"
 <paul@...l-moore.com>, "James Morris" <jmorris@...ei.org>,
 <serge@...lyn.com>, <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>,
 <keyrings@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: <kernel-team@...udflare.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] tpm: add some algorithm and constant
 definitions from the TPM spec

On Wed May 15, 2024 at 1:51 AM EEST, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > @@ -227,6 +229,7 @@ enum tpm2_command_codes {
> >  	TPM2_CC_CREATE		        = 0x0153,
> >  	TPM2_CC_LOAD		        = 0x0157,
> >  	TPM2_CC_SEQUENCE_UPDATE         = 0x015C,
> > +	TPM2_CC_SIGN		        = 0x015D,
> >  	TPM2_CC_UNSEAL		        = 0x015E,
> >  	TPM2_CC_CONTEXT_LOAD	        = 0x0161,
> >  	TPM2_CC_CONTEXT_SAVE	        = 0x0162,
>
> Ditto.
>
> > @@ -234,6 +237,7 @@ enum tpm2_command_codes {
> >  	TPM2_CC_VERIFY_SIGNATURE        = 0x0177,
> >  	TPM2_CC_GET_CAPABILITY	        = 0x017A,
> >  	TPM2_CC_GET_RANDOM	        = 0x017B,
> > +	TPM2_CC_HASH	        	= 0x017D,
> >  	TPM2_CC_PCR_READ	        = 0x017E,
> >  	TPM2_CC_PCR_EXTEND	        = 0x0182,
> >  	TPM2_CC_EVENT_SEQUENCE_COMPLETE = 0x0185,
>
>
> Ditto.

These can be in the same patch but both need a rationale.

BR, Jarkko