[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56463a97-eb90-4884-b2f5-c165f6c3516a@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 11:34:32 +0700
From: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Regressions <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>,
Linux Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
lukas.probsthain@...glemail.com
Subject: Re: Regression of e1000e (I219-LM) from 6.1.90 to 6.6.30
On 5/14/24 00:17, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 03:42:50PM +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> <lukas.probsthain@...glemail.com> reported on Bugzilla
>> (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218826) regression on his Thinkpad
>> T480 with Intel I219-LM:
>>
>>> After updating from kernel version 6.1.90 to 6.6.30, the e1000e driver exhibits a regression on a Lenovo Thinkpad T480 with an Intel I219-LM Ethernet controller.
>
> Could you try a git bisect between these two kernel versions? You
> might be able to limit it to drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e, which
> only had around 15 patches.
>
The BZ reporter (Cc'ed) says that bisection is in progress. You may
want to log in to BZ to reach him.
Thanks.
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
Powered by blists - more mailing lists