linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] sched/deadline: Fix grammar and typos in comments

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 10:25:41 +0200
From: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>
To: Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>,
 Paul Sherwood <paul.sherwood@...ethink.co.uk>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
 vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org,
 bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de, vschneid@...hat.com,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/deadline: Fix grammar and typos in comments

On 5/13/24 18:25, Phil Auld wrote:
> On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 04:19:10PM +0100 Paul Sherwood wrote:
>> On 2024-05-13 14:58, Phil Auld wrote:
>>> On Sat, May 11, 2024 at 09:26:44AM +0100 Paul Sherwood wrote:
>>>> - conjugate verb to match subject of sentence
>>>> - s/a entity/an entity/g
>>>> - s/this misbehave/this misbehaviour/
>>>> - a few typos
>>>>
>>>   - not starting all the lines of a commit message with "-", priceless.
>>>
>>> Plus, you're just repeating what's in the actual patch.
>>>
>>> Otherwise, these changes themselves look good to me.
>>
>> Thanks for the feedback - would you like me to re-submit without the
>> bullet-points, or without the text entirely?
>>
> 
> Personally I'd rather a sentence or two saying something like
> "Fix some types and grammar issues in sched deadline comments."
> Or something.  I know that's basically same as the title, but
> that gets lost in the subject line, so maybe worded a little
> differently? For this it probably doesn't need much but does
> need something. 

Yeah, I would say that a short sentence, then the bullet points, looks
better.

-- Daniel