linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH md-6.10 1/9] md: rearrange recovery

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <46448c77-894a-1ddc-30b3-42ca00b6ecd4@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 09:36:02 +0800
From: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>
To: Mariusz Tkaczyk <mariusz.tkaczyk@...ux.intel.com>,
 Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>
Cc: agk@...hat.com, snitzer@...nel.org, mpatocka@...hat.com, song@...nel.org,
 xni@...hat.com, dm-devel@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, yi.zhang@...wei.com, yangerkun@...wei.com,
 "yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH md-6.10 1/9] md: rearrange recovery_flage

Hi,

在 2024/05/13 23:12, Mariusz Tkaczyk 写道:
> On Thu,  9 May 2024 09:18:52 +0800
> Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com> wrote:
> 
> There is typo in subject.

Yes, :)
> 
>> From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
>>
>> Currently there are lots of flags and the names are confusing, since
>> there are two main types of flags, sync thread runnng status and sync
>> thread action, rearrange and update comment to improve code readability,
>> there are no functional changes.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/md/md.h | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>>   1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/md/md.h b/drivers/md/md.h
>> index 029dd0491a36..2a1cb7b889e5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/md/md.h
>> +++ b/drivers/md/md.h
>> @@ -551,22 +551,46 @@ struct mddev {
>>   };
>>   
>>   enum recovery_flags {
>> +	/* flags for sync thread running status */
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * set when one of sync action is set and new sync thread need to be
>> +	 * registered, or just add/remove spares from conf.
>> +	 */
>> +	MD_RECOVERY_NEEDED,
>> +	/* sync thread is running, or about to be started */
>> +	MD_RECOVERY_RUNNING,
>> +	/* sync thread needs to be aborted for some reason */
>> +	MD_RECOVERY_INTR,
>> +	/* sync thread is done and is waiting to be unregistered */
>> +	MD_RECOVERY_DONE,
>> +	/* running sync thread must abort immediately, and not restart */
>> +	MD_RECOVERY_FROZEN,
>> +	/* waiting for pers->start() to finish */
>> +	MD_RECOVERY_WAIT,
>> +	/* interrupted because io-error */
>> +	MD_RECOVERY_ERROR,
>> +
>> +	/* flags determines sync action */
>> +
>> +	/* if just this flag is set, action is resync. */
>> +	MD_RECOVERY_SYNC,
>> +	/*
>> +	 * paired with MD_RECOVERY_SYNC, if MD_RECOVERY_CHECK is not set,
>> +	 * action is repair, means user requested resync.
>> +	 */
>> +	MD_RECOVERY_REQUESTED,
>>   	/*
>> -	 * If neither SYNC or RESHAPE are set, then it is a recovery.
>> +	 * paired with MD_RECOVERY_SYNC and MD_RECOVERY_REQUESTED, action is
>> +	 * check.
>>   	 */
>> -	MD_RECOVERY_RUNNING,	/* a thread is running, or about to be
>> started */
>> -	MD_RECOVERY_SYNC,	/* actually doing a resync, not a recovery
>> */
>> -	MD_RECOVERY_RECOVER,	/* doing recovery, or need to try it. */
>> -	MD_RECOVERY_INTR,	/* resync needs to be aborted for some
>> reason */
>> -	MD_RECOVERY_DONE,	/* thread is done and is waiting to be
>> reaped */
>> -	MD_RECOVERY_NEEDED,	/* we might need to start a
>> resync/recover */
>> -	MD_RECOVERY_REQUESTED,	/* user-space has requested a sync
>> (used with SYNC) */
>> -	MD_RECOVERY_CHECK,	/* user-space request for check-only, no
>> repair */
>> -	MD_RECOVERY_RESHAPE,	/* A reshape is happening */
>> -	MD_RECOVERY_FROZEN,	/* User request to abort, and not
>> restart, any action */
>> -	MD_RECOVERY_ERROR,	/* sync-action interrupted because
>> io-error */
>> -	MD_RECOVERY_WAIT,	/* waiting for pers->start() to finish */
>> -	MD_RESYNCING_REMOTE,	/* remote node is running resync thread
>> */
>> +	MD_RECOVERY_CHECK,
>> +	/* recovery, or need to try it */
>> +	MD_RECOVERY_RECOVER,
>> +	/* reshape */
>> +	MD_RECOVERY_RESHAPE,
>> +	/* remote node is running resync thread */
>> +	MD_RESYNCING_REMOTE,
>>   };
>>   
>>   enum md_ro_state {
> 
> I don't know if it is better readable but I know that Kernel coding style comes
> with different approach. I used it for enum mddev_flags in md.h please take a
> look.

1) There are two kinds of flags here, for sync thread running status and
for sync action, I think it's better to distinguish them.
2) The names are confusing, for sync thread status I prefer
SYNC_THREAD_xxx and for sync action I prefer SYNC_ACTION_xxx, I plan to
remove the flags to sync action and replace them with enum type in patch
2.

> 
> Also, I get used to comment above, not below enum values but I don't have strong
> justification here.

I do comment above here.

Thanks,
Kuai

> 
> Thanks,
> Mariusz
> 
> 
> .
>