lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <44b5b31f-ac98-4c5c-8bc4-ebff9579b4d7@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 15:31:33 +0100
From: Ivan Orlov <ivan.orlov0322@...il.com>
To: Rae Moar <rmoar@...gle.com>
Cc: brendan.higgins@...ux.dev, davidgow@...gle.com,
 linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 kunit-dev@...glegroups.com, skhan@...uxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] kunit: Cover 'assert.c' with tests

On 5/14/24 01:17, Rae Moar wrote:
> On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 5:05 AM Ivan Orlov <ivan.orlov0322@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>> There are multiple assertion formatting functions in the `assert.c`
>> file, which are not covered with tests yet. Implement the KUnit test
>> for these functions.
>>
>> The test consists of 11 test cases for the following functions:
>>
>> 1) 'is_literal'
>> 2) 'is_str_literal'
>> 3) 'kunit_assert_prologue', test case for multiple assert types
>> 4) 'kunit_assert_print_msg'
>> 5) 'kunit_unary_assert_format'
>> 6) 'kunit_ptr_not_err_assert_format'
>> 7) 'kunit_binary_assert_format'
>> 8) 'kunit_binary_ptr_assert_format'
>> 9) 'kunit_binary_str_assert_format'
>> 10) 'kunit_assert_hexdump'
>> 11) 'kunit_mem_assert_format'
>>
>> The test aims at maximizing the branch coverage for the assertion
>> formatting functions.
>>
>> As you can see, it covers some of the static helper functions as
>> well, so mark the static functions in `assert.c` as 'VISIBLE_IF_KUNIT'
>> and conditionally export them with EXPORT_SYMBOL_IF_KUNIT. Add the
>> corresponding definitions to `assert.h`.
>>
>> Build the assert test when CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST is enabled, similar to
>> how it is done for the string stream test.
> 
> Hello!
> 
> This looks great to me! Thanks for all your work on this! There is
> just one comment I have below. Once that is fixed up, I am happy to
> add a reviewed-by.
> 
> Thanks!
> -Rae
> 
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ivan Orlov <ivan.orlov0322@...il.com>
>> ---
>> V1 -> V2:
>> - Check the output from the string stream for containing the key parts
>> instead of comparing the results with expected strings char by char, as
>> it was suggested by Rae Moar <rmoar@...gle.com>. Define two macros to
>> make it possible (ASSERT_TEST_EXPECT_CONTAIN and
>> ASSERT_TEST_EXPECT_NCONTAIN).
>> - Mark the static functions in `assert.c` as VISIBLE_IF_KUNIT and export
>> them conditionally if kunit is enabled instead of including the
>> `assert_test.c` file in the end of `assert.c`. This way we will decouple
>> the test from the implementation (SUT).
>> - Update the kunit_assert_hexdump test: now it checks for presense of
>> the brackets '<>' around the non-matching bytes, instead of comparing
>> the kunit_assert_hexdump output char by char.
>> V2 -> V3:
>> - Make test case array and test suite definitions static
>> - Change the condition in `assert.h`: we should declare VISIBLE_IF_KUNIT
>> functions in the header file when CONFIG_KUNIT is enabled, not
>> CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST. Otherwise, if CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST is disabled,
>> VISIBLE_IF_KUNIT functions in the `assert.c` are not static, and
>> prototypes for them can't be found.
>> - Add MODULE_LICENSE and MODULE_DESCRIPTION macros
>>
>>   include/kunit/assert.h  |  11 ++
>>   lib/kunit/Makefile      |   1 +
>>   lib/kunit/assert.c      |  24 ++-
>>   lib/kunit/assert_test.c | 391 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   4 files changed, 419 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>   create mode 100644 lib/kunit/assert_test.c
>>
>> diff --git a/include/kunit/assert.h b/include/kunit/assert.h
>> index 24c2b9fa61e8..7e7490a74b13 100644
>> --- a/include/kunit/assert.h
>> +++ b/include/kunit/assert.h
>> @@ -218,4 +218,15 @@ void kunit_mem_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert,
>>                               const struct va_format *message,
>>                               struct string_stream *stream);
>>
>> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KUNIT)
>> +void kunit_assert_print_msg(const struct va_format *message,
>> +                           struct string_stream *stream);
>> +bool is_literal(const char *text, long long value);
>> +bool is_str_literal(const char *text, const char *value);
>> +void kunit_assert_hexdump(struct string_stream *stream,
>> +                         const void *buf,
>> +                         const void *compared_buf,
>> +                         const size_t len);
>> +#endif
>> +
>>   #endif /*  _KUNIT_ASSERT_H */
>> diff --git a/lib/kunit/Makefile b/lib/kunit/Makefile
>> index 309659a32a78..be7c9903936f 100644
>> --- a/lib/kunit/Makefile
>> +++ b/lib/kunit/Makefile
>> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ endif
>>   obj-y +=                               hooks.o
>>
>>   obj-$(CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST) +=            kunit-test.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST) +=            assert_test.o
>>
>>   # string-stream-test compiles built-in only.
>>   ifeq ($(CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST),y)
>> diff --git a/lib/kunit/assert.c b/lib/kunit/assert.c
>> index dd1d633d0fe2..382eb409d34b 100644
>> --- a/lib/kunit/assert.c
>> +++ b/lib/kunit/assert.c
>> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
>>    */
>>   #include <kunit/assert.h>
>>   #include <kunit/test.h>
>> +#include <kunit/visibility.h>
>>
>>   #include "string-stream.h"
>>
>> @@ -30,12 +31,14 @@ void kunit_assert_prologue(const struct kunit_loc *loc,
>>   }
>>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_assert_prologue);
>>
>> -static void kunit_assert_print_msg(const struct va_format *message,
>> -                                  struct string_stream *stream)
>> +VISIBLE_IF_KUNIT
>> +void kunit_assert_print_msg(const struct va_format *message,
>> +                           struct string_stream *stream)
>>   {
>>          if (message->fmt)
>>                  string_stream_add(stream, "\n%pV", message);
>>   }
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_IF_KUNIT(kunit_assert_print_msg);
>>
>>   void kunit_fail_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert,
>>                                const struct va_format *message,
>> @@ -89,7 +92,7 @@ void kunit_ptr_not_err_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert,
>>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_ptr_not_err_assert_format);
>>
>>   /* Checks if `text` is a literal representing `value`, e.g. "5" and 5 */
>> -static bool is_literal(const char *text, long long value)
>> +VISIBLE_IF_KUNIT bool is_literal(const char *text, long long value)
>>   {
>>          char *buffer;
>>          int len;
>> @@ -110,6 +113,7 @@ static bool is_literal(const char *text, long long value)
>>
>>          return ret;
>>   }
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_IF_KUNIT(is_literal);
>>
>>   void kunit_binary_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert,
>>                                  const struct va_format *message,
>> @@ -166,7 +170,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_binary_ptr_assert_format);
>>   /* Checks if KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ() args were string literals.
>>    * Note: `text` will have ""s where as `value` will not.
>>    */
>> -static bool is_str_literal(const char *text, const char *value)
>> +VISIBLE_IF_KUNIT bool is_str_literal(const char *text, const char *value)
>>   {
>>          int len;
>>
>> @@ -178,6 +182,7 @@ static bool is_str_literal(const char *text, const char *value)
>>
>>          return strncmp(text + 1, value, len - 2) == 0;
>>   }
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_IF_KUNIT(is_str_literal);
>>
>>   void kunit_binary_str_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert,
>>                                      const struct va_format *message,
>> @@ -208,10 +213,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_binary_str_assert_format);
>>   /* Adds a hexdump of a buffer to a string_stream comparing it with
>>    * a second buffer. The different bytes are marked with <>.
>>    */
>> -static void kunit_assert_hexdump(struct string_stream *stream,
>> -                                const void *buf,
>> -                                const void *compared_buf,
>> -                                const size_t len)
>> +VISIBLE_IF_KUNIT
>> +void kunit_assert_hexdump(struct string_stream *stream,
>> +                         const void *buf,
>> +                         const void *compared_buf,
>> +                         const size_t len)
>>   {
>>          size_t i;
>>          const u8 *buf1 = buf;
>> @@ -229,6 +235,7 @@ static void kunit_assert_hexdump(struct string_stream *stream,
>>                          string_stream_add(stream, " %02x ", buf1[i]);
>>          }
>>   }
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_IF_KUNIT(kunit_assert_hexdump);
>>
>>   void kunit_mem_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert,
>>                               const struct va_format *message,
>> @@ -269,4 +276,5 @@ void kunit_mem_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert,
>>                  kunit_assert_print_msg(message, stream);
>>          }
>>   }
>> +
>>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_mem_assert_format);
>> diff --git a/lib/kunit/assert_test.c b/lib/kunit/assert_test.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..1347a964204b
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/lib/kunit/assert_test.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,391 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
>> +/*
>> + * KUnit test for the assertion formatting functions.
>> + * Author: Ivan Orlov <ivan.orlov0322@...il.com>
>> + */
>> +#include <kunit/test.h>
>> +#include "string-stream.h"
>> +
>> +#define TEST_PTR_EXPECTED_BUF_SIZE 32
>> +#define HEXDUMP_TEST_BUF_LEN 5
>> +#define ASSERT_TEST_EXPECT_CONTAIN(test, str, substr) KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, strstr(str, substr))
>> +#define ASSERT_TEST_EXPECT_NCONTAIN(test, str, substr) KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, strstr(str, substr))
>> +
>> +static void kunit_test_is_literal(struct kunit *test)
>> +{
>> +       KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, is_literal("5", 5));
>> +       KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, is_literal("0", 0));
>> +       KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, is_literal("1234567890", 1234567890));
>> +       KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, is_literal("-1234567890", -1234567890));
>> +       KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, is_literal("05", 5));
>> +       KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, is_literal("", 0));
>> +       KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, is_literal("-0", 0));
>> +       KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, is_literal("12#45", 1245));
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void kunit_test_is_str_literal(struct kunit *test)
>> +{
>> +       KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, is_str_literal("\"Hello, World!\"", "Hello, World!"));
>> +       KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, is_str_literal("\"\"", ""));
>> +       KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, is_str_literal("\"\"\"", "\""));
>> +       KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, is_str_literal("", ""));
>> +       KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, is_str_literal("\"", "\""));
>> +       KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, is_str_literal("\"Abacaba", "Abacaba"));
>> +       KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, is_str_literal("Abacaba\"", "Abacaba"));
>> +       KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, is_str_literal("\"Abacaba\"", "\"Abacaba\""));
>> +}
>> +
>> +KUNIT_DEFINE_ACTION_WRAPPER(kfree_wrapper, kfree, const void *);
>> +
>> +/* this function is used to get a "char *" string from the string stream and defer its cleanup  */
>> +static char *get_str_from_stream(struct kunit *test, struct string_stream *stream)
>> +{
>> +       char *str = string_stream_get_string(stream);
>> +
> 
> When trying to make the kernel with this test loaded in, I am getting
> an error that string_stream_get_string, string_stream_clear, and
> kunit_alloc_string_stream are undefined.
> 
> So either these three methods will have to be exported using
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_KUNIT or this test cannot be loaded and run as a module.
> 
> But once this is fixed up this should be good to go.

Hi Rae,

Thank you so much for the review.

At the moment, I believe the best approach would be to make this test 
depend on CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST=y (as it is done for string-stream-test).

However, I assume that every (standalone) test should be able to run as 
a module, and I'd like to add EXPORT_SYMBOL_IF_KUNIT to all of the 
non-static string-stream functions in a separate patch series. It will 
require updating string-stream-test.c as well (adding MODULE_IMPORT_NS). 
What do you think?

Thank you once again,
-- 
Kind regards,
Ivan Orlov


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ