linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v10 2/3] net: gro: move L3 flush checks to tcp_gro_receive and udp_gro_receive

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 09:06:26 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Richard Gobert <richardbgobert@...il.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>, davem@...emloft.net,
 edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com, willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com,
 dsahern@...nel.org, alexander.duyck@...il.com, shuah@...nel.org,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v10 2/3] net: gro: move L3 flush checks to
 tcp_gro_receive and udp_gro_receive_segment

On Tue, 14 May 2024 17:56:44 +0200 Richard Gobert wrote:
> > Hi Richard, any chance of getting this fixed within the next 2 hours?
> > I can't send the net-next PR if it doesn't build on one of the arches..  
> 
> Hi Jakub and Geert,
> I'm only seeing this mail now, sorry for the late response.
> I can fix this within the next two hours, would you prefer a standalone 
> patch or should I add it to this patch series?

Standalone patch, please!