linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v1 1/2] virt: memctl: control guest physical memory properties

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2024051429-cultural-prayer-438a@gregkh>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 18:07:33 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Yuanchu Xie <yuanchu@...gle.com>
Cc: Wei Liu <liuwe@...rosoft.com>, Rob Bradford <rbradford@...osinc.com>,
	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
	Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
	Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
	Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
	Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	virtualization@...ts.linux.dev, dev@...ts.cloudhypervisor.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 1/2] virt: memctl: control guest physical memory
 properties

On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 07:03:00PM -0700, Yuanchu Xie wrote:
> +/*
> + * Used for internal kernel memctl calls, i.e. to better support kernel stacks,
> + * or to efficiently zero hugetlb pages.
> + */
> +long memctl_vmm_call(__u64 func_code, __u64 addr, __u64 length, __u64 arg,
> +		     struct memctl_buf *buf)
> +{
> +	buf->call.func_code = func_code;
> +	buf->call.addr = addr;
> +	buf->call.length = length;
> +	buf->call.arg = arg;
> +
> +	return __memctl_vmm_call(buf);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(memctl_vmm_call);

You export something that is never actually called, which implies that
this is not tested at all (i.e. it is dead code.)  Please remove.

Also, why not EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL()?   (I have to ask, sorry.)

thanks,

greg k-h