[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <949fcbea-23dc-44c1-9146-c358b15b9253@lunn.ch>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 18:17:27 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Stephen Langstaff <stephenlangstaff1@...il.com>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
OlteanV@...il.com
Subject: Re: drivers/net/dsa/dsa_loop_bdinfo.c build problems
On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 05:08:24PM +0100, Stephen Langstaff wrote:
> On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 1:32 PM Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:
>
> > So try to making FIXED_PHY = m, and load it after dsa_loop_bdinfo.ko.
>
> In my configuration FIXED_PHY is selected by several other modules:
> │ Selected by [y]:
> │ - FSL_DPAA_ETH [=y] && NETDEVICES [=y] && ETHERNET [=y] &&
> NET_VENDOR_FREESCALE [=y] && FSL_DPAA [=y] && FSL_FMAN [=y]
> │ - FWNODE_MDIO [=y] && NETDEVICES [=y] && MDIO_DEVICE [=y] &&
> (ACPI [=y] || OF [=y] || COMPILE_TEST [=n])
> │ - OF_MDIO [=y] && NETDEVICES [=y] && MDIO_DEVICE [=y] && OF [=y]
> && PHYLIB [=y]
>
> ...so it looks pretty tied up with the MDIO support which I guess I
> will need for the real PHY!
>
> If I sorted out building the dsa_loop_bdinfo.c code as a built-in do
> you think that would solve the ordering issue?
Probably.
Florian test setup shows it can work.
This mdio board info stuff is based on the same concept for I2C
devices. However, it is simplified a bit, since it is not really meant
for production use. What i suspect the I2C version does is that when a
new board info is registers, it walks all the existing I2C busses and
sees if there is a match. The MDIO version is missing this, it only
runs the match when a bus is added. So it is less forgiving of order.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists