[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240514-scarlet-corgi-of-efficiency-faf2bb@penduick>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 18:22:01 +0200
From: Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>
To: Sui Jingfeng <sui.jingfeng@...ux.dev>
Cc: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] drm/bridge: Add 'struct device *' field to the
drm_bridge structure
Hi,
On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 11:40:43PM +0800, Sui Jingfeng wrote:
> Because a lot of implementations has already added it into their drived
> class, promote it into drm_bridge core may benifits a lot. drm bridge is
> a driver, it should know the underlying hardware entity.
Is there some actual benefits, or is it theoretical at this point?
Maxime
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (274 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists