lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 10:45:09 -0600
From: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Pengfei Xu <pengfei.xu@...el.com>, shuah@...nel.org,
 linux-kselftest <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, jithu.joseph@...el.com,
 ashok.raj@...el.com, sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...el.com,
 Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/4] add tests to verify IFS (In Field Scan) driver
 functionality

On 4/29/24 21:31, Pengfei Xu wrote:
> To verify IFS (In Field Scan [1]) driver functionality, add the following 6
> test cases:
>    1. Verify that IFS sysfs entries are created after loading the IFS module
>    2. Check if loading an invalid IFS test image fails and loading a valid
>       one succeeds
>    3. Perform IFS scan test on each CPU using all the available image files
>    4. Perform IFS scan with first test image file on a random CPU for 3
>       rounds
>    5. Perform IFS ARRAY BIST(Board Integrated System Test) test on each CPU
>    6. Perform IFS ARRAY BIST test on a random CPU for 3 rounds
> 
> These are not exhaustive, but some minimal test runs to check various
> parts of the driver. Some negative tests are also included.
> 
> [1] https://docs.kernel.org/arch/x86/ifs.html
> 
> Pengfei Xu (4):
>    selftests: ifs: verify test interfaces are created by the driver
>    selftests: ifs: verify test image loading functionality
>    selftests: ifs: verify IFS scan test functionality
>    selftests: ifs: verify IFS ARRAY BIST functionality
> 
>   MAINTAINERS                                   |   1 +
>   tools/testing/selftests/Makefile              |   1 +
>   .../drivers/platform/x86/intel/ifs/Makefile   |   6 +
>   .../platform/x86/intel/ifs/test_ifs.sh        | 496 ++++++++++++++++++
>   4 files changed, 504 insertions(+)
>   create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/drivers/platform/x86/intel/ifs/Makefile
>   create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/drivers/platform/x86/intel/ifs/test_ifs.sh
> 

I am fine with adding a test. I would need ifs ack or reviewed-by.
I don't see ifs maintainer on on this thread.

thanks,
-- Shuah

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ