[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9fb7adfc-701b-427c-a08e-a007e3159601@wanadoo.fr>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 22:53:00 +0200
From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
To: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>
Cc: anna-maria@...utronix.de, bristot@...hat.com, bsegall@...gle.com,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com, frederic@...nel.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, hannes@...xchg.org, imran.f.khan@...cle.com,
juri.lelli@...hat.com, leobras@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
lizefan.x@...edance.com, longman@...hat.com, mgorman@...e.de,
mingo@...hat.com, paulmck@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
rafael@...nel.org, riel@...riel.com, rostedt@...dmis.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, tj@...nel.org, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
vschneid@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] sched/topology: optimize topology_span_sane()
Le 14/05/2024 à 00:01, Yury Norov a écrit :
> The function may call cpumask_equal with tl->mask(cpu) == tl->mask(i),
> even though cpu != i. In such case, cpumask_equal() would always return
> true, and we can proceed to the next CPU immediately.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@...lic.gmane.org>
> ---
> kernel/sched/topology.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/topology.c b/kernel/sched/topology.c
> index 99ea5986038c..eb9eb17b0efa 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/topology.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/topology.c
> @@ -2360,7 +2360,7 @@ static bool topology_span_sane(struct sched_domain_topology_level *tl,
> * breaks the linking done for an earlier span.
> */
> for_each_cpu(i, cpu_map) {
> - if (i == cpu)
> + if (i == cpu || tl->mask(cpu) == tl->mask(i))
> continue;
> /*
> * We should 'and' all those masks with 'cpu_map' to exactly
Hi,
does it make sense to pre-compute tl->mask(cpu) outside the for_each_cpu()?
CJ
Powered by blists - more mailing lists