[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMknhBGxEfGJhi+0Pxi+XqCSKLAKLzhLOt_rZo+vP=XqQDqWGA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 16:42:39 -0500
From: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
Cc: "Ceclan, Dumitru" <mitrutzceclan@...il.com>, dumitru.ceclan@...log.com,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>, Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] dt-bindings: adc: ad7173: add support for ad411x
On Sat, Apr 20, 2024 at 9:33 AM Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 21:42:50 +0300
> "Ceclan, Dumitru" <mitrutzceclan@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > On 13/04/2024 13:49, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > > On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 11:08:28 +0300
> > > "Ceclan, Dumitru" <mitrutzceclan@...il.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> On 06/04/2024 17:53, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > >>> On Wed, 3 Apr 2024 10:40:39 -0500
> > >>> David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 2:43 AM Ceclan, Dumitru <mitrutzceclan@...il.com> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On 01/04/2024 22:37, David Lechner wrote:
> > >>>>>> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:10 AM Dumitru Ceclan via B4 Relay
> > >>>>>> <devnull+dumitru.ceclan.analog.com@...nel.org> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> From: Dumitru Ceclan <dumitru.ceclan@...log.com>
> > >>>>>
> > ...
> > >>
> > >>>>> Other alternative that came to my mind: attribute "adi,current-channel".
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Having a boolean flag like this would make more sense to me if we
> > >>>> don't agree that the suggestion below is simpler.
> > >>>>
> >
> > ...
> >
> > >
> > > We do directly relate reg to channel numbers in drivers like the ad7292 (where not
> > > all channels are differential) I'm not convinced either way on what is best
> > > here where reg is currently just an index into a channel specification, not
> > > meaningful for which pins are involved.
> > >
> > > It doesn't seem worth adding an equivalent of diff-channels for a single channel
> > > setup but I guess it would be more consistent.
> > >
> >
> > Would you agree with the attribute adi,current-channel within the channel and
> > diff-channels set to the correspondent current inputs (13 10 for pair IN2)?
>
> From another thread today I've concluded we do need a single-channel
> equivalent of diff-channels, but you are right that here it is a differential
> channel so <13 10> seems like the best option to me.
>
Current inputs are differential? It seems like we would need 4 input
pins for that.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists