lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <01c8dc05-76d1-478e-a4e4-3eab8d6aeaf9@quicinc.com>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 15:43:42 -0700
From: Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@...cinc.com>
To: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
CC: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
        Kalle Valo
	<kvalo@...nel.org>, Jeff Johnson <jjohnson@...nel.org>,
        Stephen Boyd
	<swboyd@...omium.org>,
        Rakesh Pillai <quic_pillair@...cinc.com>,
        <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>, <ath10k@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wifi: ath10k: fix QCOM_RPROC_COMMON dependency

On 5/14/2024 9:10 PM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 3:14 AM Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@...cinc.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 5/14/2024 10:45 AM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 11:43 PM Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@...cinc.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 5/11/2024 3:49 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>>>> If ath10k_snoc is built-in, while Qualcomm remoteprocs are built as
>>>>> modules, compilation fails with:
>>>>>
>>>>> /usr/bin/aarch64-linux-gnu-ld: drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.o: in function `ath10k_modem_init':
>>>>> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c:1534: undefined reference to `qcom_register_ssr_notifier'
>>>>> /usr/bin/aarch64-linux-gnu-ld: drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.o: in function `ath10k_modem_deinit':
>>>>> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c:1551: undefined reference to `qcom_unregister_ssr_notifier'
>>>>>
>>>>> Add corresponding dependency to ATH10K_SNOC Kconfig entry so that it's
>>>>> built as module if QCOM_RPROC_COMMON is built as module too.
>>>>>
>>>>> Fixes: 747ff7d3d742 ("ath10k: Don't always treat modem stop events as crashes")
>>>>> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>  drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/Kconfig | 1 +
>>>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/Kconfig b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/Kconfig
>>>>> index e6ea884cafc1..4f385f4a8cef 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/Kconfig
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/Kconfig
>>>>> @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ config ATH10K_SNOC
>>>>>       depends on ATH10K
>>>>>       depends on ARCH_QCOM || COMPILE_TEST
>>>>>       depends on QCOM_SMEM
>>>>> +     depends on QCOM_RPROC_COMMON || QCOM_RPROC_COMMON=n
>>>>>       select QCOM_SCM
>>>>>       select QCOM_QMI_HELPERS
>>>>>       help
>>>>>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> base-commit: 75fa778d74b786a1608d55d655d42b480a6fa8bd
>>>>> change-id: 20240511-ath10k-snoc-dep-862a9da2e6bb
>>>>
>>>> I see how this fixes the problem, but this doesn't seem like an ideal
>>>> solution. The fact that the *_ssr_notifier() functions are correctly protected
>>>> by conditional compilation ideally should mean that clients don't need to call
>>>> call out this as a dependency. Otherwise, it would mean we'd need to do this
>>>> for all feature flags.
>>>
>>>
>>> It depends on if qcom_common.c is optional for ath10k_snoc.
>>>
>>> If it is optional, this patch is correct.
>>
>> At least from a build perspective it is optional
> 
> 
> 
> You need to make a decision from a run-time perspective
> (that is, whether you are fine with having
> ar_snoc->notifier == NULL)
> 
> 
> If you are able to build the kernel successfully
> but you get a run-time error (e.g. NULL pointer dereference),
> it is even worse because run-time debugging is generally more
> difficult than compile-time debugging.

The current patch maintains the existing logic, so that is my preference.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ