linux-kernel - [PATCH 03/12] shmem: move folio zero operation to write

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 05:57:25 +0000
From: Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@...sung.com>
To: "hughd@...gle.com" <hughd@...gle.com>, "akpm@...ux-foundation.org"
	<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, "willy@...radead.org" <willy@...radead.org>,
	"jack@...e.cz" <jack@...e.cz>, "mcgrof@...nel.org" <mcgrof@...nel.org>
CC: "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>, "linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org>, "djwong@...nel.org" <djwong@...nel.org>,
	"Pankaj Raghav" <p.raghav@...sung.com>, "dagmcr@...il.com"
	<dagmcr@...il.com>, "yosryahmed@...gle.com" <yosryahmed@...gle.com>,
	"baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com" <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
	"ritesh.list@...il.com" <ritesh.list@...il.com>,
	"lsf-pc@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <lsf-pc@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	"david@...hat.com" <david@...hat.com>, "chandan.babu@...cle.com"
	<chandan.babu@...cle.com>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "brauner@...nel.org" <brauner@...nel.org>,
	Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@...sung.com>
Subject: [PATCH 03/12] shmem: move folio zero operation to write_begin()

Simplify zero out operation by moving it from write_end() to the
write_begin(). If a large folio does not have any block uptodate when we
first get it, zero it out entirely.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@...sung.com>
---
 mm/shmem.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c
index 4818f9fbd328..86ad539b6a0f 100644
--- a/mm/shmem.c
+++ b/mm/shmem.c
@@ -149,6 +149,14 @@ static inline bool sfs_is_fully_uptodate(struct folio *folio)
 	return bitmap_full(sfs->state, i_blocks_per_folio(inode, folio));
 }
 
+static inline bool sfs_is_any_uptodate(struct folio *folio)
+{
+	struct inode *inode = folio->mapping->host;
+	struct shmem_folio_state *sfs = folio->private;
+
+	return !bitmap_empty(sfs->state, i_blocks_per_folio(inode, folio));
+}
+
 static inline bool sfs_is_block_uptodate(struct shmem_folio_state *sfs,
 					 unsigned int block)
 {
@@ -239,6 +247,15 @@ static void sfs_free(struct folio *folio, bool force)
 	kfree(folio_detach_private(folio));
 }
 
+static inline bool shmem_is_any_uptodate(struct folio *folio)
+{
+	struct shmem_folio_state *sfs = folio->private;
+
+	if (folio_test_large(folio) && sfs)
+		return sfs_is_any_uptodate(folio);
+	return folio_test_uptodate(folio);
+}
+
 static void shmem_set_range_uptodate(struct folio *folio, size_t off,
 				     size_t len)
 {
@@ -2872,6 +2889,9 @@ shmem_write_begin(struct file *file, struct address_space *mapping,
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
+	if (!shmem_is_any_uptodate(folio))
+		folio_zero_range(folio, 0, folio_size(folio));
+
 	*pagep = folio_file_page(folio, index);
 	if (PageHWPoison(*pagep)) {
 		folio_unlock(folio);
@@ -2894,13 +2914,6 @@ shmem_write_end(struct file *file, struct address_space *mapping,
 	if (pos + copied > inode->i_size)
 		i_size_write(inode, pos + copied);
 
-	if (!folio_test_uptodate(folio)) {
-		if (copied < folio_size(folio)) {
-			size_t from = offset_in_folio(folio, pos);
-			folio_zero_segments(folio, 0, from,
-					from + copied, folio_size(folio));
-		}
-	}
 	shmem_set_range_uptodate(folio, 0, folio_size(folio));
 	folio_mark_dirty(folio);
 	folio_unlock(folio);
-- 
2.43.0