lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 08:41:17 +0200
From: Gabriel FERNANDEZ <gabriel.fernandez@...s.st.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Alexandre Torgue
	<alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof
 Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Maxime Coquelin
	<mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] clk: stm32mp2: use of STM32 access controller


On 5/8/24 00:02, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting gabriel.fernandez@...s.st.com (2024-04-19 08:27:21)
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/stm32/clk-stm32mp25.c b/drivers/clk/stm32/clk-stm32mp25.c
>> index 210b75b39e50..a37ee9f707e3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/stm32/clk-stm32mp25.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/stm32/clk-stm32mp25.c
>> @@ -4,7 +4,9 @@
>>    * Author: Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@...s.st.com> for STMicroelectronics.
>>    */
>>   
>> +#include <linux/bus/stm32_firewall_device.h>
> I don't have this include. I either need a signed tag or this needs to
> wait until next merge window.

Sorry for the delay, i was off.

I was based on tag next-20240419

>>   #include <linux/clk-provider.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
> What is this include for?

yes #include <linux/io.h> is more appropriate.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ