linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] net: phy: dp83869: Fix RGMII-SGMII and 1000BASE-X

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <97128846-75d5-705a-5f-9bb9dc85f842@brueckmann-gmbh.de>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 09:47:19 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Geßler <gessler_t@...eckmann-gmbh.de>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
cc: Thomas Gessler <thomas.gessler@...eckmann-gmbh.de>, 
    Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>, 
    Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, 
    "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, 
    Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, 
    Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, 
    linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, MD Danish Anwar <danishanwar@...com>, 
    Ravi Gunasekaran <r-gunasekaran@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] net: phy: dp83869: Fix RGMII-SGMII and 1000BASE-X

On Tue, 14 May 2024, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> Please go through all these defines and see what match to existing
> ones.

Will do.

I defined them to make explicit that they are the correct bits for
registers with non-standard offsets that exist in addition to the usual
BMCR, BMSR, etc. (which are used only for other PHY modes). But since the
bits are identical, I guess this rather leads to duplication.

Thomas