[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1jle4bxloe.fsf@starbuckisacylon.baylibre.com>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 15:12:02 +0200
From: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>
To: Dmitry Rokosov <ddrokosov@...utedevices.com>
Cc: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>, neil.armstrong@...aro.org,
mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, khilman@...libre.com,
martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com, jian.hu@...ogic.com,
kernel@...rdevices.ru, rockosov@...il.com,
linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] clk: meson: introduce 'INIT_ONCE' flag to
eliminate init for enabled PLL
On Tue 14 May 2024 at 00:47, Dmitry Rokosov <ddrokosov@...utedevices.com> wrote:
>>
>> I agree that currently that carefully reading the code clears that up
>> but it is misleading
>>
>> CLK_MESON_PLL_EN_NOINIT ?
>>
>
> I have been considering this name and its derivatives, such as:
>
> CLK_MESON_PLL_SKIP_ENABLED
> CLK_MESON_PLL_NOINIT_ENABLED
That one accurately describes what you do.
Use this one please
Powered by blists - more mailing lists