| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <ea17d93b-2493-46c4-a9ab-d95e8203a07a@foss.st.com>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 15:47:50 +0200
From: Benjamin Mugnier <benjamin.mugnier@...s.st.com>
To: R Sundar <prosunofficial@...il.com>, <sylvain.petinot@...s.st.com>,
<mchehab@...nel.org>, <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
<laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
CC: <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<skhan@...uxfoundation.org>, <javier.carrasco.cruz@...il.com>,
Julia Lawall
<julia.lawall@...ia.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 linux-next] media: i2c: st-mipid02: replace
of_node_put() with __free
Hi,
On 5/14/24 17:20, R Sundar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the comments.
>
> On 13/05/24 17:13, Benjamin Mugnier wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I took sometime to reflect on this. Currently I favor drivers
>> consistency.
>
>
>> Merging this patch as is would introduce some differences between the
>> vgxy61 and other drivers that follow the 'of_node_put' flow, which I
>> think is not an improvement.
>>
>
> I checked st-vgxy61.c file, I didn't find of_node_put().
Apologize, I meant st-mipid02.
> Any file apart from this, you want to see those changes? If yes let me
> know, please.
> Meanwhile I am also looking into it.
>
> This patch mainly reduce the goto error statements and increases
> readability of the code.
>
>> Now, this patch is certainly good. Would it be possible to extend it to
>> all other drivers using the 'of_node_put' ?
>>
> yes, people are working on it to replace of_node_put() in many places.
> soon many patches can be expected to come in , for replacing of_node_put
> with auto cleanup module.
> I am also adding these changes to few other files also.
Good, I'd rather see a series with all these files then to ease the
review. But I only maintain the st-mipid02 so other people opinion may
differ.
>
> Thanks,
> >> That would the consistency issue while improving code quality at the
>> same time.
>>
>> Thank you.
>> >
>> On 4/29/24 18:37, R Sundar wrote:
>>> Use the new cleanup magic to replace of_node_put() with
>>> __free(device_node) marking to auto release and to simplify the error
>>> paths.
>>>
>>> Suggested-by: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr>
>>> Signed-off-by: R Sundar <prosunofficial@...il.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Changes since v1 -
>>>
>>> - Added missed out __free() marking in mipid02_parse_tx_ep().
>>> - In mipid02_parse_tx_ep(), In error case, return value is always
>>> -EINVAL. so
>>> sending the -EINVAL instead of ret variable value.
>>>
>>> Link to v1 -
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240427095643.11486-1-prosunofficial@gmail.com/#t
>>>
>>> drivers/media/i2c/st-mipid02.c | 37 +++++++++-------------------------
>>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/st-mipid02.c
>>> b/drivers/media/i2c/st-mipid02.c
>>> index f250640729ca..bd3cf94f8534 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/st-mipid02.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/st-mipid02.c
>>> @@ -715,31 +715,28 @@ static int mipid02_parse_rx_ep(struct
>>> mipid02_dev *bridge)
>>> struct v4l2_fwnode_endpoint ep = { .bus_type =
>>> V4L2_MBUS_CSI2_DPHY };
>>> struct i2c_client *client = bridge->i2c_client;
>>> struct v4l2_async_connection *asd;
>>> - struct device_node *ep_node;
>>> int ret;
>>> /* parse rx (endpoint 0) */
>>> - ep_node =
>>> of_graph_get_endpoint_by_regs(bridge->i2c_client->dev.of_node,
>>> - 0, 0);
>>> + struct device_node *ep_node __free(device_node) =
>>> +
>>> of_graph_get_endpoint_by_regs(bridge->i2c_client->dev.of_node, 0, 0);
>>> if (!ep_node) {
>>> dev_err(&client->dev, "unable to find port0 ep");
>>> - ret = -EINVAL;
>>> - goto error;
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> }
>>> ret = v4l2_fwnode_endpoint_parse(of_fwnode_handle(ep_node),
>>> &ep);
>>> if (ret) {
>>> dev_err(&client->dev, "Could not parse v4l2 endpoint %d\n",
>>> ret);
>>> - goto error_of_node_put;
>>> + return ret;
>>> }
>>> /* do some sanity checks */
>>> if (ep.bus.mipi_csi2.num_data_lanes > 2) {
>>> dev_err(&client->dev, "max supported data lanes is 2 / got
>>> %d",
>>> ep.bus.mipi_csi2.num_data_lanes);
>>> - ret = -EINVAL;
>>> - goto error_of_node_put;
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> }
>>> /* register it for later use */
>>> @@ -750,7 +747,6 @@ static int mipid02_parse_rx_ep(struct mipid02_dev
>>> *bridge)
>>> asd = v4l2_async_nf_add_fwnode_remote(&bridge->notifier,
>>> of_fwnode_handle(ep_node),
>>> struct v4l2_async_connection);
>>> - of_node_put(ep_node);
>>> if (IS_ERR(asd)) {
>>> dev_err(&client->dev, "fail to register asd to notifier %ld",
>>> @@ -764,46 +760,31 @@ static int mipid02_parse_rx_ep(struct
>>> mipid02_dev *bridge)
>>> v4l2_async_nf_cleanup(&bridge->notifier);
>>> return ret;
>>> -
>>> -error_of_node_put:
>>> - of_node_put(ep_node);
>>> -error:
>>> -
>>> - return ret;
>>> }
>>> static int mipid02_parse_tx_ep(struct mipid02_dev *bridge)
>>> {
>>> struct v4l2_fwnode_endpoint ep = { .bus_type =
>>> V4L2_MBUS_PARALLEL };
>>> struct i2c_client *client = bridge->i2c_client;
>>> - struct device_node *ep_node;
>>> int ret;
>>> /* parse tx (endpoint 2) */
>>> - ep_node =
>>> of_graph_get_endpoint_by_regs(bridge->i2c_client->dev.of_node,
>>> - 2, 0);
>>> + struct device_node *ep_node __free(device_node) =
>>> +
>>> of_graph_get_endpoint_by_regs(bridge->i2c_client->dev.of_node, 2, 0);
>>> if (!ep_node) {
>>> dev_err(&client->dev, "unable to find port1 ep");
>>> - ret = -EINVAL;
>>> - goto error;
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> }
>>> ret = v4l2_fwnode_endpoint_parse(of_fwnode_handle(ep_node),
>>> &ep);
>>> if (ret) {
>>> dev_err(&client->dev, "Could not parse v4l2 endpoint\n");
>>> - goto error_of_node_put;
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> }
>>> - of_node_put(ep_node);
>>> bridge->tx = ep;
>>> return 0;
>>> -
>>> -error_of_node_put:
>>> - of_node_put(ep_node);
>>> -error:
>>> -
>>> - return -EINVAL;
>>> }
>>> static int mipid02_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
>>
>
--
Regards,
Benjamin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists